standards.rst
182 lines
| 6.0 KiB
| text/x-rst
|
RstLexer
r303 | ||||
====================== | ||||
Contribution Standards | ||||
====================== | ||||
Standards help to improve the quality of our product and its development. Herein | ||||
we define our standards for processes and development to maintain consistency | ||||
and function well as a community. It is a work in progress; modifications to this | ||||
document should be discussed and agreed upon by the community. | ||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Code | ||||
==== | ||||
This provides an outline for standards we use in our codebase to keep our code | ||||
easy to read and easy to maintain. Much of our code guidelines are based on the | ||||
book `Clean Code <http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educator/product/Clean-Code-A-Handbook-of-Agile-Software-Craftsmanship/9780132350884.page>`_ | ||||
by Robert Martin. | ||||
We maintain a Tech Glossary to provide consistency in terms and symbolic names | ||||
used for items and concepts within the application. This is found in the CE | ||||
project in /docs-internal/glossary.rst | ||||
Refactoring | ||||
----------- | ||||
Make it better than you found it! | ||||
Our codebase can always use improvement and often benefits from refactoring. | ||||
New code should be refactored as it is being written, and old code should be | ||||
treated with the same care as if it was new. Before doing any refactoring, | ||||
ensure that there is test coverage on the affected code; this will help | ||||
minimize issues. | ||||
Python | ||||
------ | ||||
For Python, we use `PEP8 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/>`_. | ||||
We adjust lines of code to under 80 characters and use 4 spaces for indentation. | ||||
JavaScript | ||||
---------- | ||||
This currently remains undefined. Suggestions welcome! | ||||
r701 | However, we have decided to go forward with W3C standards and picked | |||
WebComponents as the foundation of user interface. New functionality should | ||||
be implemented as components using the | ||||
`Polymer Project` <https://www.polymer-project.org>`_ library | ||||
and should avoid external dependencies like `jquery`. | ||||
r303 | ||||
HTML | ||||
---- | ||||
Unfortunately, we currently have no strict HTML standards, but there are a few | ||||
guidelines we do follow. Templates must work in all modern browsers. HTML should | ||||
be clean and easy to read, and additionally should be free of inline CSS or | ||||
JavaScript. It is recommended to use data attributes for JS actions where | ||||
possible in order to separate it from styling and prevent unintentional changes. | ||||
LESS/CSS | ||||
-------- | ||||
We use LESS for our CSS; see :doc:`frontend` for structure and formatting | ||||
guidelines. | ||||
Linters | ||||
------- | ||||
Currently, we have a linter for pull requests which checks code against PEP8. | ||||
We intend to add more in the future as we clarify standards. | ||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Naming Conventions | ||||
================== | ||||
These still need to be defined for naming everything from Python variables to | ||||
HTML classes to files and folders. | ||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Testing | ||||
======= | ||||
Testing is a very important aspect of our process, especially as we are our own | ||||
quality control team. While it is of course unrealistic to hit every potential | ||||
combination, our goal is to cover every line of Python code with a test. | ||||
The following is a brief introduction to our test suite. Our tests are primarily | ||||
written using `py.test <http://pytest.org/>`_ | ||||
Acceptance Tests | ||||
---------------- | ||||
Also known as "ac tests", these test from the user and business perspective to | ||||
check if the requirements of a feature are met. Scenarios are created at a | ||||
feature's inception and help to define its value. | ||||
r305 | py.test is used for ac tests; they are located in a repo separate from the | |||
r303 | other tests which follow. Each feature has a .feature file which contains a | |||
brief description and the scenarios to be tested. | ||||
Functional Tests | ||||
---------------- | ||||
These test specific functionality in the application which checks through the | ||||
entire stack. Typically these are user actions or permissions which go through | ||||
the web browser. They are located in rhodecode/tests. | ||||
Unit Tests | ||||
---------- | ||||
These test isolated, individual modules to ensure that they function correctly. | ||||
They are located in rhodecode/tests. | ||||
Integration Tests | ||||
----------------- | ||||
These are used for testing performance of larger systems than the unit tests. | ||||
They are located in rhodecode/tests. | ||||
JavaScript Testing | ||||
------------------ | ||||
Currently, we have not defined how to test our JavaScript code. | ||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Pull Requests | ||||
============= | ||||
Pull requests should generally contain only one thing: a single feature, one bug | ||||
fix, etc.. The commit history should be concise and clean, and the pull request | ||||
should contain the ticket number (also a good idea for the commits themselves) | ||||
to provide context for the reviewer. | ||||
See also: :doc:`checklist-pull-request` | ||||
Reviewers | ||||
--------- | ||||
Each pull request must be approved by at least one member of the RhodeCode | ||||
team. Assignments may be based on expertise or familiarity with a particular | ||||
area of code, or simply availability. Switching up or adding extra community | ||||
members for different pull requests helps to share knowledge as well as provide | ||||
other perspectives. | ||||
Responsibility | ||||
-------------- | ||||
The community is responsible for maintaining features and this must be taken | ||||
into consideration. External contributions must be held to the same standards | ||||
as internal contributions. | ||||
Feature Switch | ||||
-------------- | ||||
Experimental and work-in-progress features can be hidden behind one of two | ||||
switches: | ||||
* A setting can be added to the Labs page in the Admin section which may allow | ||||
customers to access and toggle additional features. | ||||
* For work-in-progress or other features where customer access is not desired, | ||||
use a custom setting in the .ini file as a trigger. | ||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Tickets | ||||
======= | ||||
Redmine tickets are a crucial part of our development process. Any code added or | ||||
changed in our codebase should have a corresponding ticket to document it. With | ||||
this in mind, it is important that tickets be as clear and concise as possible, | ||||
including what the expected outcome is. | ||||
See also: :doc:`checklist-tickets` | ||||