##// END OF EJS Templates
auth: don't break hashing in case of user with empty password....
auth: don't break hashing in case of user with empty password. In some cases such as LDAP user created via external scripts users might set the passwords to empty. The hashing uses the md5(password_hash) to store reference to detect password changes and forbid using the same password. In case of pure LDAP users this is not valid, and we shouldn't raise Errors in such case. This change makes it work for empty passwords now.

File last commit:

r1323:41333240 default
r2203:8a18c3c3 default
Show More
test_comment.py
159 lines | 5.6 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
project: added all source files and assets
r1 # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
license: updated copyright year to 2017
r1271 # Copyright (C) 2010-2017 RhodeCode GmbH
project: added all source files and assets
r1 #
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3
# (only), as published by the Free Software Foundation.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
#
# This program is dual-licensed. If you wish to learn more about the
# RhodeCode Enterprise Edition, including its added features, Support services,
# and proprietary license terms, please see https://rhodecode.com/licenses/
import mock
import pytest
from rhodecode.lib.diffs import DiffLineNumber
from rhodecode.model import comment
@pytest.mark.parametrize('value, expected', [
('o1', DiffLineNumber(1, None)),
('o798', DiffLineNumber(798, None)),
('n1', DiffLineNumber(None, 1)),
('n100000', DiffLineNumber(None, 100000)),
])
def test_parse_comment_line_number(value, expected):
result = comment._parse_comment_line_number(value)
assert result == expected
@pytest.mark.parametrize('value, should_raise', [
(None, AttributeError),
('2', ValueError),
('first_line', ValueError),
('olast_line', ValueError),
])
def test_parse_comment_line_number_raises(value, should_raise):
with pytest.raises(should_raise):
comment._parse_comment_line_number(value)
@pytest.mark.parametrize('old, new, expected', [
(None, 1, 'n1'),
(None, 2, 'n2'),
(None, 10, 'n10'),
(1, None, 'o1'),
(10, None, 'o10'),
# Ensuring consistent behavior, although there is no line 0 used.
(None, 0, 'n0'),
(0, None, 'o0'),
# Using the empty string to reflect what the comment model does
(None, None, ''),
# Give a preference to the new line number if both are given
(1, 1, 'n1'),
])
def test_diff_to_comment_line_number(old, new, expected):
diff_line = DiffLineNumber(old=old, new=new)
comment_line = comment._diff_to_comment_line_number(diff_line)
assert comment_line == expected
@pytest.mark.parametrize('diff_line, expected', [
(DiffLineNumber(old=1, new=None), DiffLineNumber(old=2, new=None)),
(DiffLineNumber(old=11, new=None), DiffLineNumber(old=2, new=None)),
(DiffLineNumber(old=12, new=None), DiffLineNumber(old=21, new=None)),
])
def test_choose_closest_diff_line_normal(diff_line, expected):
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 comment_model = comment.CommentsModel()
project: added all source files and assets
r1 candidates = [
DiffLineNumber(old=2, new=None),
DiffLineNumber(old=21, new=None),
]
result = comment_model._choose_closest_diff_line(diff_line, candidates)
assert result == expected
def test_revision_comments_are_sorted():
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 comment_model = comment.CommentsModel()
project: added all source files and assets
r1 query = comment_model._get_inline_comments_query(
repo_id='fake_repo_name',
revision='fake_revision',
pull_request=None)
assert_inline_comments_order(query)
@pytest.mark.parametrize('use_outdated', [True, False])
def test_pull_request_comments_are_sorted(use_outdated):
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 comment_model = comment.CommentsModel()
project: added all source files and assets
r1 pull_request = mock.Mock()
# TODO: johbo: Had to do this since we have an inline call to
# self.__get_pull_request. Should be moved out at some point.
get_instance_patcher = mock.patch.object(
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 comment.CommentsModel, '_get_instance',
project: added all source files and assets
r1 return_value=pull_request)
config_patcher = mock.patch.object(
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 comment.CommentsModel, 'use_outdated_comments',
project: added all source files and assets
r1 return_value=use_outdated)
with get_instance_patcher, config_patcher as config_mock:
query = comment_model._get_inline_comments_query(
repo_id='fake_repo_name',
revision=None,
pull_request=pull_request)
config_mock.assert_called_once_with(pull_request)
assert_inline_comments_order(query)
def assert_inline_comments_order(query):
"""
Sorting by ID will make sure that the latest comments are at the bottom.
"""
order_by = query._order_by
assert order_by
assert len(order_by) == 1
assert str(order_by[0]) == 'changeset_comments.comment_id ASC'
def test_get_renderer():
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 model = comment.CommentsModel()
project: added all source files and assets
r1 renderer = model._get_renderer()
assert renderer == "rst"
class TestUseOutdatedComments(object):
@pytest.mark.parametrize('use_outdated', [True, False])
def test_returns_value_from_db(self, use_outdated):
pull_request = mock.Mock()
general_settings = {
'rhodecode_use_outdated_comments': use_outdated
}
with self._patch_settings(general_settings) as settings_mock:
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 result = comment.CommentsModel.use_outdated_comments(
project: added all source files and assets
r1 pull_request)
settings_mock.assert_called_once_with(repo=pull_request.target_repo)
assert result == use_outdated
def test_default_value(self):
pull_request = mock.Mock()
general_settings = {}
with self._patch_settings(general_settings) as settings_mock:
comments: renamed ChangesetCommentsModel to CommentsModel to reflect what it actually does....
r1323 result = comment.CommentsModel.use_outdated_comments(
project: added all source files and assets
r1 pull_request)
settings_mock.assert_called_once_with(repo=pull_request.target_repo)
assert result is False
def _patch_settings(self, value):
vcs_settings_mock = mock.Mock()
vcs_settings_mock.get_general_settings.return_value = value
return mock.patch.object(
comment, 'VcsSettingsModel', return_value=vcs_settings_mock)