Show More
@@ -1,41 +1,40 b'' | |||
|
1 | 1 | ## Opening an Issue |
|
2 | 2 | |
|
3 | 3 | When opening a new Issue, please take the following steps: |
|
4 | 4 | |
|
5 | 5 | 1. Search GitHub and/or Google for your issue to avoid duplicate reports. |
|
6 | 6 | Keyword searches for your error messages are most helpful. |
|
7 | 7 | 2. If possible, try updating to master and reproducing your issue, |
|
8 | 8 | because we may have already fixed it. |
|
9 | 9 | 3. Try to include a minimal reproducible test case |
|
10 | 10 | 4. Include relevant system information. Start with the output of: |
|
11 | 11 | |
|
12 | 12 | python -c "import IPython; print(IPython.sys_info())" |
|
13 | 13 | |
|
14 | 14 | And include any relevant package versions, depending on the issue, |
|
15 | 15 | such as matplotlib, numpy, Qt, Qt bindings (PyQt/PySide), tornado, web browser, etc. |
|
16 | 16 | |
|
17 | 17 | ## Pull Requests |
|
18 | 18 | |
|
19 | 19 | Some guidelines on contributing to IPython: |
|
20 | 20 | |
|
21 | 21 | * All work is submitted via Pull Requests. |
|
22 | 22 | * Pull Requests can be submitted as soon as there is code worth discussing. |
|
23 | 23 | Pull Requests track the branch, so you can continue to work after the PR is submitted. |
|
24 | 24 | Review and discussion can begin well before the work is complete, |
|
25 | 25 | and the more discussion the better. |
|
26 | 26 | The worst case is that the PR is closed. |
|
27 | 27 | * Pull Requests should generally be made against master |
|
28 | 28 | * Pull Requests should be tested, if feasible: |
|
29 | 29 | - bugfixes should include regression tests |
|
30 | 30 | - new behavior should at least get minimal exercise |
|
31 | 31 | * New features and backwards-incompatible changes should be documented by adding |
|
32 |
a new file to the [ |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 | details. | |
|
32 | a new file to the [pr](docs/source/whatsnew/pr) directory, see [the README.md | |
|
33 | there](docs/source/whatsnew/pr/README.md) for details. | |
|
35 | 34 | |
|
36 | 35 | [Travis](http://travis-ci.org/#!/ipython/ipython) does a pretty good job testing IPython and Pull Requests, |
|
37 | 36 | but it may make sense to manually perform tests (possibly with our `test_pr` script), |
|
38 | 37 | particularly for PRs that affect `IPython.parallel` or Windows. |
|
39 | 38 | |
|
40 | 39 | For more detailed information, see our [GitHub Workflow](https://github.com/ipython/ipython/wiki/Dev:-GitHub-workflow). |
|
41 | 40 |
@@ -1,17 +1,17 b'' | |||
|
1 | 1 | Documenting What's New |
|
2 | 2 | ---------------------- |
|
3 | 3 | |
|
4 | 4 | When making a new pull request that either adds a new feature, or makes a |
|
5 | 5 | backwards-incompatible change to IPython, please add a new `.rst` file in this |
|
6 | 6 | directory documenting this change as a part of your Pull Request. |
|
7 | 7 | |
|
8 | 8 | This will allow multiple Pull Requests to do the same without conflicting with |
|
9 | 9 | one another. Periodically, IPython developers with commit rights will run a |
|
10 |
script and populate [develop |
|
|
11 | of this directory, and clean it up. | |
|
10 | script and populate [development.rst](../development.rst) | |
|
11 | with the contents of this directory, and clean it up. | |
|
12 | 12 | |
|
13 | 13 | Files which describe new features can have any name, such as |
|
14 | 14 | `antigravity-feature.rst`, whereas backwards incompatible changes should have a |
|
15 | 15 | filename of `incompat-switching-to-perl.rst`. Our "What's new" files always have |
|
16 | 16 | two sections, and this prefix scheme will make sure that the backwards |
|
17 | 17 | incompatible changes get routed to their proper section. |
General Comments 0
You need to be logged in to leave comments.
Login now