##// END OF EJS Templates
Refuse to install event loop hooks when not using `prompt_toolkit` (#14132)...
Refuse to install event loop hooks when not using `prompt_toolkit` (#14132) Without this, `%gui` is effectively a no-op but the user thinks it works. For example. If running `ipython`: ``` In [1]: import matplotlib; matplotlib.use('QtAgg'); from matplotlib import pyplot; pyplot.ion(); pyplot.plot([1, 2, 3, 4]) Installed qt6 event loop hook. Out[1]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x1ba2f59d2a0>] ``` The window appears and responds as expected. If running `ipython --simple-prompt`, the user would see the same output, when in fact no event loop hook was installed since it's not supported without `prompt_toolkit`. The resulting Qt window is unresponsive because the event loop is not running, i.e. with `--simple-prompt`, Qt windows should block (but `pyplot` doesn't/can't know to do that) With this PR, the user will see: ``` In [1]: import matplotlib; matplotlib.use('QtAgg'); from matplotlib import pyplot; pyplot.ion(); pyplot.plot([1, 2, 3, 4]) Cannot install event loop hook for "qt" when running with `--simple-prompt`. NOTE: Tk is supported natively; use Tk apps and Tk backends with `--simple-prompt`. Out[1]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x170be0c0310>] ``` They'll still get an unresponsive Qt window, but they'll at least be told this can't work (while anything using Tk will work just fine).

File last commit:

r24265:69a22c2c
r28368:22fc5ab5 merge
Show More
test_ipunittest.py
131 lines | 3.2 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
"""Tests for IPython's test support utilities.
These are decorators that allow standalone functions and docstrings to be seen
as tests by unittest, replicating some of nose's functionality. Additionally,
IPython-syntax docstrings can be auto-converted to '>>>' so that ipython
sessions can be copy-pasted as tests.
This file can be run as a script, and it will call unittest.main(). We must
check that it works with unittest as well as with nose...
Notes:
- Using nosetests --with-doctest --doctest-tests testfile.py
will find docstrings as tests wherever they are, even in methods. But
if we use ipython syntax in the docstrings, they must be decorated with
@ipdocstring. This is OK for test-only code, but not for user-facing
docstrings where we want to keep the ipython syntax.
- Using nosetests --with-doctest file.py
also finds doctests if the file name doesn't have 'test' in it, because it is
treated like a normal module. But if nose treats the file like a test file,
then for normal classes to be doctested the extra --doctest-tests is
necessary.
- running this script with python (it has a __main__ section at the end) misses
one docstring test, the one embedded in the Foo object method. Since our
approach relies on using decorators that create standalone TestCase
instances, it can only be used for functions, not for methods of objects.
Authors
-------
- Fernando Perez <Fernando.Perez@berkeley.edu>
"""
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Copyright (C) 2009-2011 The IPython Development Team
#
# Distributed under the terms of the BSD License. The full license is in
# the file COPYING, distributed as part of this software.
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Imports
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
from IPython.testing.ipunittest import ipdoctest, ipdocstring
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test classes and functions
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@ipdoctest
def simple_dt():
"""
>>> print(1+1)
2
"""
@ipdoctest
def ipdt_flush():
"""
In [20]: print(1)
1
In [26]: for i in range(4):
....: print(i)
....:
....:
0
1
2
3
In [27]: 3+4
Out[27]: 7
"""
@ipdoctest
def ipdt_indented_test():
"""
In [20]: print(1)
1
In [26]: for i in range(4):
....: print(i)
....:
....:
0
1
2
3
In [27]: 3+4
Out[27]: 7
"""
class Foo(object):
"""For methods, the normal decorator doesn't work.
But rewriting the docstring with ip2py does, *but only if using nose
--with-doctest*. Do we want to have that as a dependency?
"""
@ipdocstring
def ipdt_method(self):
"""
In [20]: print(1)
1
In [26]: for i in range(4):
....: print(i)
....:
....:
0
1
2
3
In [27]: 3+4
Out[27]: 7
"""
def normaldt_method(self):
"""
>>> print(1+1)
2
"""