##// END OF EJS Templates
Backport PR #9211: Release process tweaks...
Backport PR #9211: Release process tweaks Things I ran into while releasing 4.1.1. The only one that might be controversial is removing the `python -m compileall` check before we build packages. Because this is hardcoded to `python`, it runs on Python 2 on my system, and fails on one of our tools scripts that happens to be Python 3 only. We could make this smarter, but I don't think it's worth it. We now have continuous integration and editors with built in static analysis, so if we make a file invalid Python syntax we'll know about it well before release. I also ran into a problem in that I don't have access to archive.ipython.org (I'm sure I did on one of my other computers, but I forget which). There should probably be a check for that somewhere earlier in the build process, but I haven't included it here.

File last commit:

r1334:049617d6
r22210:624ab5d1
Show More
test_exampleip.txt
30 lines | 816 B | text/plain | TextLexer
=================================
Tests in example form - IPython
=================================
You can write text files with examples that use IPython prompts (as long as you
use the nose ipython doctest plugin), but you can not mix and match prompt
styles in a single file. That is, you either use all ``>>>`` prompts or all
IPython-style prompts. Your test suite *can* have both types, you just need to
put each type of example in a separate. Using IPython prompts, you can paste
directly from your session::
In [5]: s="Hello World"
In [6]: s.upper()
Out[6]: 'HELLO WORLD'
Another example::
In [8]: 1+3
Out[8]: 4
Just like in IPython docstrings, you can use all IPython syntax and features::
In [9]: !echo "hello"
hello
In [10]: a='hi'
In [11]: !echo $a
hi