##// END OF EJS Templates
only sort small dicts and sets in lib.pretty...
only sort small dicts and sets in lib.pretty The sorting caused performance problems when displaying large collections, even when the result would be truncated.

File last commit:

r11024:4571a5fb
r18457:7aba3f1e
Show More
test_ansi_code_processor.py
171 lines | 6.8 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
/ IPython / qt / console / tests / test_ansi_code_processor.py
# Standard library imports
import unittest
# Local imports
from IPython.qt.console.ansi_code_processor import AnsiCodeProcessor
class TestAnsiCodeProcessor(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.processor = AnsiCodeProcessor()
def test_clear(self):
""" Do control sequences for clearing the console work?
"""
string = '\x1b[2J\x1b[K'
i = -1
for i, substring in enumerate(self.processor.split_string(string)):
if i == 0:
self.assertEqual(len(self.processor.actions), 1)
action = self.processor.actions[0]
self.assertEqual(action.action, 'erase')
self.assertEqual(action.area, 'screen')
self.assertEqual(action.erase_to, 'all')
elif i == 1:
self.assertEqual(len(self.processor.actions), 1)
action = self.processor.actions[0]
self.assertEqual(action.action, 'erase')
self.assertEqual(action.area, 'line')
self.assertEqual(action.erase_to, 'end')
else:
self.fail('Too many substrings.')
self.assertEqual(i, 1, 'Too few substrings.')
def test_colors(self):
""" Do basic controls sequences for colors work?
"""
string = 'first\x1b[34mblue\x1b[0mlast'
i = -1
for i, substring in enumerate(self.processor.split_string(string)):
if i == 0:
self.assertEqual(substring, 'first')
self.assertEqual(self.processor.foreground_color, None)
elif i == 1:
self.assertEqual(substring, 'blue')
self.assertEqual(self.processor.foreground_color, 4)
elif i == 2:
self.assertEqual(substring, 'last')
self.assertEqual(self.processor.foreground_color, None)
else:
self.fail('Too many substrings.')
self.assertEqual(i, 2, 'Too few substrings.')
def test_colors_xterm(self):
""" Do xterm-specific control sequences for colors work?
"""
string = '\x1b]4;20;rgb:ff/ff/ff\x1b' \
'\x1b]4;25;rgbi:1.0/1.0/1.0\x1b'
substrings = list(self.processor.split_string(string))
desired = { 20 : (255, 255, 255),
25 : (255, 255, 255) }
self.assertEqual(self.processor.color_map, desired)
string = '\x1b[38;5;20m\x1b[48;5;25m'
substrings = list(self.processor.split_string(string))
self.assertEqual(self.processor.foreground_color, 20)
self.assertEqual(self.processor.background_color, 25)
def test_scroll(self):
""" Do control sequences for scrolling the buffer work?
"""
string = '\x1b[5S\x1b[T'
i = -1
for i, substring in enumerate(self.processor.split_string(string)):
if i == 0:
self.assertEqual(len(self.processor.actions), 1)
action = self.processor.actions[0]
self.assertEqual(action.action, 'scroll')
self.assertEqual(action.dir, 'up')
self.assertEqual(action.unit, 'line')
self.assertEqual(action.count, 5)
elif i == 1:
self.assertEqual(len(self.processor.actions), 1)
action = self.processor.actions[0]
self.assertEqual(action.action, 'scroll')
self.assertEqual(action.dir, 'down')
self.assertEqual(action.unit, 'line')
self.assertEqual(action.count, 1)
else:
self.fail('Too many substrings.')
self.assertEqual(i, 1, 'Too few substrings.')
def test_formfeed(self):
""" Are formfeed characters processed correctly?
"""
string = '\f' # form feed
self.assertEqual(list(self.processor.split_string(string)), [''])
self.assertEqual(len(self.processor.actions), 1)
action = self.processor.actions[0]
self.assertEqual(action.action, 'scroll')
self.assertEqual(action.dir, 'down')
self.assertEqual(action.unit, 'page')
self.assertEqual(action.count, 1)
def test_carriage_return(self):
""" Are carriage return characters processed correctly?
"""
string = 'foo\rbar' # carriage return
splits = []
actions = []
for split in self.processor.split_string(string):
splits.append(split)
actions.append([action.action for action in self.processor.actions])
self.assertEqual(splits, ['foo', None, 'bar'])
self.assertEqual(actions, [[], ['carriage-return'], []])
def test_carriage_return_newline(self):
"""transform CRLF to LF"""
string = 'foo\rbar\r\ncat\r\n\n' # carriage return and newline
# only one CR action should occur, and '\r\n' should transform to '\n'
splits = []
actions = []
for split in self.processor.split_string(string):
splits.append(split)
actions.append([action.action for action in self.processor.actions])
self.assertEqual(splits, ['foo', None, 'bar', '\r\n', 'cat', '\r\n', '\n'])
self.assertEqual(actions, [[], ['carriage-return'], [], ['newline'], [], ['newline'], ['newline']])
def test_beep(self):
""" Are beep characters processed correctly?
"""
string = 'foo\abar' # bell
splits = []
actions = []
for split in self.processor.split_string(string):
splits.append(split)
actions.append([action.action for action in self.processor.actions])
self.assertEqual(splits, ['foo', None, 'bar'])
self.assertEqual(actions, [[], ['beep'], []])
def test_backspace(self):
""" Are backspace characters processed correctly?
"""
string = 'foo\bbar' # backspace
splits = []
actions = []
for split in self.processor.split_string(string):
splits.append(split)
actions.append([action.action for action in self.processor.actions])
self.assertEqual(splits, ['foo', None, 'bar'])
self.assertEqual(actions, [[], ['backspace'], []])
def test_combined(self):
""" Are CR and BS characters processed correctly in combination?
BS is treated as a change in print position, rather than a
backwards character deletion. Therefore a BS at EOL is
effectively ignored.
"""
string = 'abc\rdef\b' # CR and backspace
splits = []
actions = []
for split in self.processor.split_string(string):
splits.append(split)
actions.append([action.action for action in self.processor.actions])
self.assertEqual(splits, ['abc', None, 'def', None])
self.assertEqual(actions, [[], ['carriage-return'], [], ['backspace']])
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()