|
|
"""Simple example using doctests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This file just contains doctests both using plain python and IPython prompts.
|
|
|
All tests should be loaded by nose.
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
def pyfunc():
|
|
|
"""Some pure python tests...
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> pyfunc()
|
|
|
'pyfunc'
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> import os
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 2+3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> for i in range(3):
|
|
|
... print i,
|
|
|
... print i+1,
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
0 1 1 2 2 3
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
return 'pyfunc'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def ipfunc():
|
|
|
"""Some ipython tests...
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [1]: import os
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [2]: cd /
|
|
|
/
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [3]: 2+3
|
|
|
Out[3]: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [26]: for i in range(3):
|
|
|
....: print i,
|
|
|
....: print i+1,
|
|
|
....:
|
|
|
0 1 1 2 2 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples that access the operating system work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [1]: !echo hello
|
|
|
hello
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [2]: !echo hello > /tmp/foo
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [3]: !cat /tmp/foo
|
|
|
hello
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [4]: rm -f /tmp/foo
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to use '_' for the last result, but do NOT try to use IPython's
|
|
|
numbered history of _NN outputs, since those won't exist under the
|
|
|
doctest environment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [7]: 3+4
|
|
|
Out[7]: 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [8]: _+3
|
|
|
Out[8]: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [9]: ipfunc()
|
|
|
Out[9]: 'ipfunc'
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
return 'ipfunc'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def ranfunc():
|
|
|
"""A function with some random output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal examples are verified as usual:
|
|
|
>>> 1+3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
But if you put '# random' in the output, it is ignored:
|
|
|
>>> 1+3
|
|
|
junk goes here... # random
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+2
|
|
|
again, anything goes #random
|
|
|
if multiline, the random mark is only needed once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+2
|
|
|
You can also put the random marker at the end:
|
|
|
# random
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+2
|
|
|
# random
|
|
|
.. or at the beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
More correct input is properly verified:
|
|
|
>>> ranfunc()
|
|
|
'ranfunc'
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
return 'ranfunc'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def random_all():
|
|
|
"""A function where we ignore the output of ALL examples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
# all-random
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mark tells the testing machinery that all subsequent examples should
|
|
|
be treated as random (ignoring their output). They are still executed,
|
|
|
so if a they raise an error, it will be detected as such, but their
|
|
|
output is completely ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+3
|
|
|
junk goes here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+3
|
|
|
klasdfj;
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> 1+2
|
|
|
again, anything goes
|
|
|
blah...
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def iprand():
|
|
|
"""Some ipython tests with random output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [7]: 3+4
|
|
|
Out[7]: 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [8]: print 'hello'
|
|
|
world # random
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [9]: iprand()
|
|
|
Out[9]: 'iprand'
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
return 'iprand'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def iprand_all():
|
|
|
"""Some ipython tests with fully random output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# all-random
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [7]: 1
|
|
|
Out[7]: 99
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [8]: print 'hello'
|
|
|
world
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [9]: iprand_all()
|
|
|
Out[9]: 'junk'
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
return 'iprand_all'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|