|
|
============
|
|
|
Coding guide
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
General coding conventions
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, we'll try to follow the standard Python style conventions as
|
|
|
described in Python's PEP 8 [PEP8]_, the official Python Style Guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other general comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In a large file, top level classes and functions should be separated by 2
|
|
|
lines to make it easier to separate them visually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Use 4 spaces for indentation, **never** use hard tabs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Keep the ordering of methods the same in classes that have the same methods.
|
|
|
This is particularly true for classes that implement similar interfaces and
|
|
|
for interfaces that are similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naming conventions
|
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
In terms of naming conventions, we'll follow the guidelines of PEP 8 [PEP8]_.
|
|
|
Some of the existing code doesn't honor this perfectly, but for all new
|
|
|
IPython code (and much existing code is being refactored), we'll use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* All ``lowercase`` module names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``CamelCase`` for class names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``lowercase_with_underscores`` for methods, functions, variables and
|
|
|
attributes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This may be confusing as some of the existing codebase uses a different
|
|
|
convention (``lowerCamelCase`` for methods and attributes). Slowly, we will
|
|
|
move IPython over to the new convention, providing shadow names for backward
|
|
|
compatibility in public interfaces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are, however, some important exceptions to these rules. In some cases,
|
|
|
IPython code will interface with packages (Twisted, Wx, Qt) that use other
|
|
|
conventions. At some level this makes it impossible to adhere to our own
|
|
|
standards at all times. In particular, when subclassing classes that use other
|
|
|
naming conventions, you must follow their naming conventions. To deal with
|
|
|
cases like this, we propose the following policy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If you are subclassing a class that uses different conventions, use its
|
|
|
naming conventions throughout your subclass. Thus, if you are creating a
|
|
|
Twisted Protocol class, used Twisted's
|
|
|
``namingSchemeForMethodsAndAttributes.``
|
|
|
|
|
|
* All IPython's official interfaces should use our conventions. In some cases
|
|
|
this will mean that you need to provide shadow names (first implement
|
|
|
``fooBar`` and then ``foo_bar = fooBar``). We want to avoid this at all
|
|
|
costs, but it will probably be necessary at times. But, please use this
|
|
|
sparingly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation-specific *private* methods will use
|
|
|
``_single_underscore_prefix``. Names with a leading double underscore will
|
|
|
*only* be used in special cases, as they makes subclassing difficult (such
|
|
|
names are not easily seen by child classes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally some run-in lowercase names are used, but mostly for very short
|
|
|
names or where we are implementing methods very similar to existing ones in a
|
|
|
base class (like ``runlines()`` where ``runsource()`` and ``runcode()`` had
|
|
|
established precedent).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The old IPython codebase has a big mix of classes and modules prefixed with an
|
|
|
explicit ``IP``. In Python this is mostly unnecessary, redundant and frowned
|
|
|
upon, as namespaces offer cleaner prefixing. The only case where this approach
|
|
|
is justified is for classes which are expected to be imported into external
|
|
|
namespaces and a very generic name (like Shell) is too likely to clash with
|
|
|
something else. However, if a prefix seems absolutely necessary the more
|
|
|
specific ``IPY`` or ``ipy`` are preferred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [PEP8] Python Enhancement Proposal 8. http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
