##// END OF EJS Templates
localrepo: experimental support for non-zlib revlog compression...
localrepo: experimental support for non-zlib revlog compression The final part of integrating the compression manager APIs into revlog storage is the plumbing for repositories to advertise they are using non-zlib storage and for revlogs to instantiate a non-zlib compression engine. The main intent of the compression manager work was to zstd all of the things. Adding zstd to revlogs has proved to be more involved than other places because revlogs are... special. Very small inputs and the use of delta chains (which are themselves a form of compression) are a completely different use case from streaming compression, which bundles and the wire protocol employ. I've conducted numerous experiments with zstd in revlogs and have yet to formalize compression settings and a storage architecture that I'm confident I won't regret later. In other words, I'm not yet ready to commit to a new mechanism for using zstd - or any other compression format - in revlogs. That being said, having some support for zstd (and other compression formats) in revlogs in core is beneficial. It can allow others to conduct experiments. This patch introduces *highly experimental* support for non-zlib compression formats in revlogs. Introduced is a config option to control which compression engine to use. Also introduced is a namespace of "exp-compression-*" requirements to denote support for non-zlib compression in revlogs. I've prefixed the namespace with "exp-" (short for "experimental") because I'm not confident of the requirements "schema" and in no way want to give the illusion of supporting these requirements in the future. I fully intend to drop support for these requirements once we figure out what we're doing with zstd in revlogs. A good portion of the patch is teaching the requirements system about registered compression engines and passing the requested compression engine as an opener option so revlogs can instantiate the proper compression engine for new operations. That's a verbose way of saying "we can now use zstd in revlogs!" On an `hg pull` conversion of the mozilla-unified repo with no extra redelta settings (like aggressivemergedeltas), we can see the impact of zstd vs zlib in revlogs: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! chunk ! wall 2.032052 comb 2.040000 user 1.990000 sys 0.050000 (best of 5) ! wall 1.866360 comb 1.860000 user 1.820000 sys 0.040000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.877261 comb 1.870000 user 1.860000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! wall 1.705410 comb 1.710000 user 1.690000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! chunk ! wall 2.721427 comb 2.720000 user 2.640000 sys 0.080000 (best of 4) ! wall 2.035076 comb 2.030000 user 1.950000 sys 0.080000 (best of 5) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.614561 comb 2.620000 user 2.580000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! wall 1.910252 comb 1.910000 user 1.880000 sys 0.030000 (best of 6) $ hg perfrevlog -c -d 1 ! wall 4.812885 comb 4.820000 user 4.800000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.699621 comb 4.710000 user 4.700000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlog -m -d 1000 ! wall 34.252800 comb 34.250000 user 33.730000 sys 0.520000 (best of 3) ! wall 24.094999 comb 24.090000 user 23.320000 sys 0.770000 (best of 3) Only modest wins for the changelog. But manifest reading is significantly faster. What's going on? One reason might be data volume. zstd decompresses faster. So given more bytes, it will put more distance between it and zlib. Another reason is size. In the current design, zstd revlogs are *larger*: debugcreatestreamclonebundle (size in bytes) zlib: 1,638,852,492 zstd: 1,680,601,332 I haven't investigated this fully, but I reckon a significant cause of larger revlogs is that the zstd frame/header has more bytes than zlib's. For very small inputs or data that doesn't compress well, we'll tend to store more uncompressed chunks than with zlib (because the compressed size isn't smaller than original). This will make revlog reading faster because it is doing less decompression. Moving on to bundle performance: $ hg bundle -a -t none-v2 (total CPU time) zlib: 102.79s zstd: 97.75s So, marginal CPU decrease for reading all chunks in all revlogs (this is somewhat disappointing). $ hg bundle -a -t <engine>-v2 (total CPU time) zlib: 191.59s zstd: 115.36s This last test effectively measures the difference between zlib->zlib and zstd->zstd for revlogs to bundle. This is a rough approximation of what a server does during `hg clone`. There are some promising results for zstd. But not enough for me to feel comfortable advertising it to users. We'll get there...

File last commit:

r27334:9007f697 default
r30818:4c0a5a25 default
Show More
base85.py
77 lines | 1.9 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 # base85.py: pure python base85 codec
#
# Copyright (C) 2009 Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com>
#
Martin Geisler
updated license to be explicit about GPL version 2
r8225 # This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
Matt Mackall
Update license to GPLv2+
r10263 # GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701
Gregory Szorc
base85: use absolute_import
r27334 from __future__ import absolute_import
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 import struct
_b85chars = "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" \
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz!#$%&()*+-;<=>?@^_`{|}~"
Mads Kiilerich
Optimization of pure.base85.b85encode...
r7835 _b85chars2 = [(a + b) for a in _b85chars for b in _b85chars]
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 _b85dec = {}
def _mkb85dec():
Martin Geisler
replace "i in range(len(xs))" with "i, x in enumerate(xs)"...
r8632 for i, c in enumerate(_b85chars):
_b85dec[c] = i
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701
def b85encode(text, pad=False):
"""encode text in base85 format"""
l = len(text)
r = l % 4
if r:
text += '\0' * (4 - r)
longs = len(text) >> 2
words = struct.unpack('>%dL' % (longs), text)
Alejandro Santos
compat: use // for integer division
r9029 out = ''.join(_b85chars[(word // 52200625) % 85] +
_b85chars2[(word // 7225) % 7225] +
Mads Kiilerich
Optimization of pure.base85.b85encode...
r7835 _b85chars2[word % 7225]
for word in words)
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701
if pad:
return out
# Trim padding
olen = l % 4
if olen:
olen += 1
Alejandro Santos
compat: use // for integer division
r9029 olen += l // 4 * 5
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 return out[:olen]
def b85decode(text):
"""decode base85-encoded text"""
if not _b85dec:
_mkb85dec()
l = len(text)
out = []
for i in range(0, len(text), 5):
Matt Mackall
many, many trivial check-code fixups
r10282 chunk = text[i:i + 5]
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 acc = 0
Martin Geisler
replace "i in range(len(xs))" with "i, x in enumerate(xs)"...
r8632 for j, c in enumerate(chunk):
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 try:
Martin Geisler
replace "i in range(len(xs))" with "i, x in enumerate(xs)"...
r8632 acc = acc * 85 + _b85dec[c]
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 except KeyError:
Patrick Mezard
pure/base85: align exception type/msg on base85.c...
r16598 raise ValueError('bad base85 character at position %d'
% (i + j))
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 if acc > 4294967295:
Patrick Mezard
pure/base85: align exception type/msg on base85.c...
r16598 raise ValueError('Base85 overflow in hunk starting at byte %d' % i)
Brendan Cully
Pure python base85 fallback...
r7701 out.append(acc)
# Pad final chunk if necessary
cl = l % 5
if cl:
acc *= 85 ** (5 - cl)
if cl > 1:
acc += 0xffffff >> (cl - 2) * 8
out[-1] = acc
out = struct.pack('>%dL' % (len(out)), *out)
if cl:
out = out[:-(5 - cl)]
return out