##// END OF EJS Templates
update: warn about other topological heads on bare update...
update: warn about other topological heads on bare update A concern around the user experience of Mercurial is user getting stuck on there own topological branch forever. For example, someone pulling another topological branch, missing that message in pull asking them to merge and getting stuck on there own local branch. The current way to "address" this concern was for bare 'hg update' to target the tipmost (also latest pulled) changesets and complain when the update was not linear. That way, failure to merge newly pulled changesets would result in some kind of failure. Yet the failure was quite obscure, not working in all cases (eg: commit right after pull) and the behavior was very impractical in the common case (eg: issue4673). To be able to change that behavior, we need to provide other ways to alert a user stucks on one of many topological head. We do so with an extra message after bare update: 1 other heads for branch "default" Bookmark get its own special version: 1 other divergent bookmarks for "foobar" There is significant room to improve the message itself, and we should augment it with hint about how to see theses other heads or handle the situation (see in-line comment). But having "a" message is already a significant improvement compared to the existing situation. Once we have it we can iterate on a better version of it. As having such message is an important step toward changing the default destination for update and other nicety, I would like to move forward quickly on getting such message. This was discussed during London - October 2015 Sprint.

File last commit:

r25295:701df761 default
r28029:72072cfc default
Show More
test-pull-branch.t
214 lines | 5.1 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-pull-branch.t
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
r12279 $ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am1 # 0
adding foo
$ hg branch branchA
marked working directory as branch branchA
Matt Mackall
branch: warn on branching
r15615 (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
r12279 $ echo a1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma1 # 1
$ cd ..
$ hg init tt
$ cd tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
(run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ echo a2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma2 # 2
Create branch B:
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch branchB
marked working directory as branch branchB
$ echo b1 > foo
$ hg ci -mb1 # 3
$ cd ../tt
A new branch is there
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Develop both branches:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a3 > foo
$ hg ci -ma3 # 4
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b2 > foo
$ hg ci -mb2 # 5
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed, no new heads:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Add a head on other branch:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a4 > foo
$ hg ci -ma4 # 6
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.1 # 7
$ hg up 5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.2 # 8
created new head
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed because there is only one head on our branch:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.1 # 9
$ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.2 # 10
created new head
$ hg up 7
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.1 # 11
$ hg up -C 8
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.2 # 12
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
Brendan Cully
Make pull -u behave like pull && update...
r14485 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
r12279
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
r13803 Make changes on new branch on tt
Brendan Cully
Make pull -u behave like pull && update...
r14485 $ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
r13803 $ hg branch branchC
marked working directory as branch branchC
Mads Kiilerich
check-code: fix check for trailing whitespace on sh command lines...
r17345 $ echo b1 > bar
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
r13804 $ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
r13803 adding bar
Make changes on default branch on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Mads Kiilerich
check-code: fix check for trailing whitespace on sh command lines...
r17345 $ echo a1 > bar
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
r13804 $ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
r13803 adding bar
Pull branchC from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
r13804
Make changes on default and branchC on tt
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
$ hg up -C default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar1
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on tt"
adding bar1
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar2
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar2
Make changes on default and branchC on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up default
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar3
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
adding bar3
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar4
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar4
Pull from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+2 heads)
(run 'hg heads .' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
Mads Kiilerich
tests: add missing trailing 'cd ..'...
r16913
$ cd ..