##// END OF EJS Templates
dummysmtpd: don't die on client connection errors...
dummysmtpd: don't die on client connection errors The connection refused error in test-patchbomb-tls.t[1] is sporadic, but one of the more often seen errors on Windows. I added enough logging to a file and dumped it out at the end to make the following observations: - The listening socket is successfully created and bound to the port, and the "listening at..." message is always logged. - Generally, the following is the entire log output, with the "accepted ..." message having been added after `sslutil.wrapserversocket`: listening at localhost:$HGPORT $LOCALIP ssl error accepted connect accepted connect $LOCALIP from=quux to=foo, bar $LOCALIP ssl error - In the cases that fail, asyncore.loop() in the run() method is exiting, but not with an exception. - In the cases that fail, the following is logged right after "listening ...": Traceback (most recent call last): File "c:\\Python27\\lib\\asyncore.py", line 83, in read obj.handle_read_event() File "c:\\Python27\\lib\\asyncore.py", line 443, in handle_read_event self.handle_accept() File "../tests/dummysmtpd.py", line 80, in handle_accept conn = sslutil.wrapserversocket(conn, ui, certfile=self._certfile) File "..\\mercurial\\sslutil.py", line 570, in wrapserversocket return sslcontext.wrap_socket(sock, server_side=True) File "c:\\Python27\\lib\\ssl.py", line 363, in wrap_socket _context=self) File "c:\\Python27\\lib\\ssl.py", line 611, in __init__ self.do_handshake() File "c:\\Python27\\lib\\ssl.py", line 840, in do_handshake self._sslobj.do_handshake() error: [Errno 10054] $ECONNRESET$ - If the base class handler is overridden completely, the the first "ssl error" line is replaced by the stacktrace, but the other lines are unchanged. The client behaves no differently, whether or not the server stacktraced. In general, `./run-tests.py --local -j9 -t9000 test-patchbomb-tls.t --runs-per-test 20` would show the issue after a run or two. With this change, `./run-tests.py --local -j9 -t9000 test-patchbomb-tls.t --loop` ran 800 times without a hiccup. This makes me wonder if the other connection refused messages that bubble up on occasion are caused by a similar issue. It seems a bit drastic to kill the whole server on account of a single communication failure with a client. # no-check-commit because of handle_error() [1] https://buildbot.mercurial-scm.org/builders/Win7%20x86_64%20hg%20tests/builds/421/steps/run-tests.py%20%28python%202.7.13%29/logs/stdio

File last commit:

r32506:2dcb3d52 default
r35794:75bae697 default
Show More
mpatchbuild.py
35 lines | 1.0 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
Yuya Nishihara
cffi: rename build scripts...
r32505 from __future__ import absolute_import
import cffi
import os
ffi = cffi.FFI()
mpatch_c = os.path.join(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..',
'mpatch.c'))
Yuya Nishihara
cffi: put compiled modules into mercurial.cffi package...
r32506 ffi.set_source("mercurial.cffi._mpatch", open(mpatch_c).read(),
Yuya Nishihara
cffi: rename build scripts...
r32505 include_dirs=["mercurial"])
ffi.cdef("""
struct mpatch_frag {
int start, end, len;
const char *data;
};
struct mpatch_flist {
struct mpatch_frag *base, *head, *tail;
};
extern "Python" struct mpatch_flist* cffi_get_next_item(void*, ssize_t);
int mpatch_decode(const char *bin, ssize_t len, struct mpatch_flist** res);
ssize_t mpatch_calcsize(size_t len, struct mpatch_flist *l);
void mpatch_lfree(struct mpatch_flist *a);
static int mpatch_apply(char *buf, const char *orig, size_t len,
struct mpatch_flist *l);
struct mpatch_flist *mpatch_fold(void *bins,
struct mpatch_flist* (*get_next_item)(void*, ssize_t),
ssize_t start, ssize_t end);
""")
if __name__ == '__main__':
ffi.compile()