##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.
Gregory Szorc - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r29526:9d02bed8 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
client-cert.pem
17 lines | 1.0 KiB | application/pgp-keys | AscLexer
/ tests / sslcerts / client-cert.pem
History | Source | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
Yuya Nishihara
tests: extract SSL certificates from test-https.t...
 r29331 -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
Gregory Szorc
tests: regenerate x509 test certificates...
 r29526 MIICyTCCAbECAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwMTESMBAGA1UEAwwJbG9jYWxob3N0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 Nishihara
tests: extract SSL certificates from test-https.t...
 r29331 -----END CERTIFICATE-----