##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

doc: unify section level between help topics...
doc: unify section level between help topics Some help topics use "-" for the top level underlining section mark, but "-" is used also for the top level categorization in generated documents: "hg.1.html", for example. So, TOC in such documents contain "sections in each topics", too. This patch changes underlining section mark in some help topics to unify section level in generated documents. After this patching, levels of each section marks are: level0 """""" level1 ====== level2 ------ level3 ...... level4 ###### And use of section markers in each documents are: - mercurial/help/*.txt can use level1 or more (now these use level1 and level2) - help for core commands can use level2 or more (now these use no section marker) - descriptions of extensions can use level2 or more (now hgext/acl uses level2) - help for commands defined in extension can use level4 or more (now "convert" of hgext/convert uses level4) "Level0" is used as top level categorization only in "doc/hg.1.txt" and the intermediate file generated by "doc/gendoc.py", so end users don't see it in "hg help" outoput and so on.
Mads Kiilerich - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r16913:f2719b38 default
r17267:979b107e stable
Show More
test-pull-branch.t
216 lines | 5.2 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-pull-branch.t
History | Source | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
 r12279 $ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am1 # 0
adding foo
$ hg branch branchA
marked working directory as branch branchA
Matt Mackall
branch: warn on branching
 r15615 (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
 r12279 $ echo a1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma1 # 1
$ cd ..
$ hg init tt
$ cd tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
(run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ echo a2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma2 # 2
Create branch B:
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch branchB
marked working directory as branch branchB
Matt Mackall
branch: warn on branching
 r15615 (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
 r12279 $ echo b1 > foo
$ hg ci -mb1 # 3
$ cd ../tt
A new branch is there
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Develop both branches:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a3 > foo
$ hg ci -ma3 # 4
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b2 > foo
$ hg ci -mb2 # 5
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed, no new heads:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Add a head on other branch:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a4 > foo
$ hg ci -ma4 # 6
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.1 # 7
$ hg up 5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.2 # 8
created new head
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed because there is only one head on our branch:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.1 # 9
$ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.2 # 10
created new head
$ hg up 7
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.1 # 11
$ hg up -C 8
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.2 # 12
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
Brendan Cully
Make pull -u behave like pull && update...
 r14485 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Adrian Buehlmann
combine tests
 r12279
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
 r13803 Make changes on new branch on tt
Brendan Cully
Make pull -u behave like pull && update...
 r14485 $ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
 r13803 $ hg branch branchC
marked working directory as branch branchC
Matt Mackall
branch: warn on branching
 r15615 (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
 r13803 $ echo b1 > bar
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
 r13804 $ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
 r13803 adding bar
Make changes on default branch on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
 r13804 $ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
Kevin Berridge
pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches...
 r13803 adding bar
Pull branchC from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
Kevin Berridge
pull: new output message when there are multiple branches...
 r13804
Make changes on default and branchC on tt
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
$ hg up -C default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar1
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on tt"
adding bar1
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar2
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar2
Make changes on default and branchC on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up default
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar3
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
adding bar3
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar4
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar4
Pull from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+2 heads)
(run 'hg heads .' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
Mads Kiilerich
tests: add missing trailing 'cd ..'...
 r16913
$ cd ..