##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.

File last commit:

r22046:7a9cbb31 default
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-casecollision.t
69 lines | 1.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-casecollision.t
Matt Mackall
tests: replace exit 80 with #require
r22046 #require no-icasefs
Kevin Gessner
add: notify when adding a file that would cause a case-folding collision...
r14068
test file addition with colliding case
$ hg init repo1
$ cd repo1
$ echo a > a
$ echo A > A
$ hg add a
$ hg st
A a
? A
$ hg add --config ui.portablefilenames=abort A
abort: possible case-folding collision for A
[255]
$ hg st
A a
? A
$ hg add A
warning: possible case-folding collision for A
$ hg st
A A
A a
$ hg forget A
$ hg st
A a
? A
$ hg add --config ui.portablefilenames=no A
$ hg st
A A
A a
Joshua Redstone
casecollision: add tests...
r17096 $ mkdir b
$ touch b/c b/D
$ hg add b
adding b/D
adding b/c
$ touch b/d b/C
$ hg add b/C
warning: possible case-folding collision for b/C
$ hg add b/d
warning: possible case-folding collision for b/d
$ touch b/a1 b/a2
$ hg add b
adding b/a1
adding b/a2
$ touch b/A2 b/a1.1
$ hg add b/a1.1 b/A2
warning: possible case-folding collision for b/A2
$ touch b/f b/F
$ hg add b/f b/F
warning: possible case-folding collision for b/f
$ touch g G
$ hg add g G
warning: possible case-folding collision for g
$ mkdir h H
$ touch h/x H/x
$ hg add h/x H/x
warning: possible case-folding collision for h/x
$ touch h/s H/s
$ hg add h/s
$ hg add H/s
warning: possible case-folding collision for H/s
Adrian Buehlmann
test-casecollision.t: add test for case changing rename
r14178
case changing rename must not warn or abort
$ echo c > c
$ hg ci -qAmx
$ hg mv c C
Kevin Gessner
add: notify when adding a file that would cause a case-folding collision...
r14068 $ cd ..