##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.

File last commit:

r22485:efedda4a default
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-impexp-branch.t
81 lines | 1.9 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-impexp-branch.t
Patrick Mezard
patch: be more tolerant with "Parent" header (issue3356)...
r16475 $ echo '[extensions]' >> $HGRCPATH
Martin Geisler
tests: use strip extension instead of mq where it makes sense...
r20115 $ echo 'strip =' >> $HGRCPATH
Patrick Mezard
patch: be more tolerant with "Parent" header (issue3356)...
r16475
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 $ cat >findbranch.py <<EOF
> import re, sys
>
> head_re = re.compile('^#(?:(?:\\s+([A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_]*)(?:\\s.*)?)|(?:\\s*))$')
>
> for line in sys.stdin:
> hmatch = head_re.match(line)
> if not hmatch:
> sys.exit(1)
> if hmatch.group(1) == 'Branch':
> sys.exit(0)
> sys.exit(1)
> EOF
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 $ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo "Rev 1" >rev
$ hg add rev
$ hg commit -m "No branch."
$ hg branch abranch
marked working directory as branch abranch
Matt Mackall
branch: warn on branching
r15615 (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 $ echo "Rev 2" >rev
$ hg commit -m "With branch."
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126
$ hg export 0 > ../r0.patch
$ hg export 1 > ../r1.patch
$ cd ..
$ if python findbranch.py < r0.patch; then
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 > echo "Export of default branch revision has Branch header" 1>&2
> exit 1
> fi
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126
$ if python findbranch.py < r1.patch; then
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 > : # Do nothing
> else
> echo "Export of branch revision is missing Branch header" 1>&2
> exit 1
> fi
Make sure import still works with branch information in patches.
$ hg init b
$ cd b
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126 $ hg import ../r0.patch
applying ../r0.patch
$ hg import ../r1.patch
applying ../r1.patch
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: unify test-impexp-branch
r12119 $ cd ..
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126
$ hg init c
$ cd c
Matt Mackall
import: let --exact 'work' with --no-commit (issue4376)
r22485 $ hg import --exact --no-commit ../r0.patch
applying ../r0.patch
warning: can't check exact import with --no-commit
$ hg st
A rev
$ hg revert -a
forgetting rev
$ rm rev
Nicolas Dumazet
tests: export patches only once in test-impexp-branch
r14126 $ hg import --exact ../r0.patch
applying ../r0.patch
$ hg import --exact ../r1.patch
applying ../r1.patch
Patrick Mezard
patch: be more tolerant with "Parent" header (issue3356)...
r16475
Test --exact and patch header separators (issue3356)
$ hg strip --no-backup .
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>>> import re
>>> p = file('../r1.patch', 'rb').read()
>>> p = re.sub(r'Parent\s+', 'Parent ', p)
>>> file('../r1-ws.patch', 'wb').write(p)
$ hg import --exact ../r1-ws.patch
applying ../r1-ws.patch
Mads Kiilerich
tests: add missing trailing 'cd ..'...
r16913
$ cd ..