##// END OF EJS Templates
util: lower water mark when removing nodes after cost limit reached...
util: lower water mark when removing nodes after cost limit reached See the inline comment for the reasoning here. This is a pretty common strategy for garbage collectors, other cache-like primtives. The performance impact is substantial: $ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 100 ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.659181 comb 1.650000 user 1.650000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.722122 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 1.139955 comb 1.140000 user 1.140000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.182513 comb 1.180000 user 1.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 ! inserts ! wall 0.679546 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15) ! sets ! wall 0.825147 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.105273 comb 25.080000 user 25.080000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.724397 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed ! wall 0.807096 comb 0.810000 user 0.810000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 12.104470 comb 12.070000 user 12.070000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.190563 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 --mixedgetfreq 90 ! inserts ! wall 0.711177 comb 0.710000 user 0.710000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! sets ! wall 0.846992 comb 0.850000 user 0.850000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.963028 comb 25.960000 user 25.960000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 2.184311 comb 2.180000 user 2.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5) ! mixed ! wall 0.728256 comb 0.730000 user 0.730000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 3.174256 comb 3.170000 user 3.170000 sys 0.000000 (best of 4) ! wall 0.773186 comb 0.770000 user 0.770000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 100000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --mixedgetfreq 90 --costlimit 5000000 ! gets ! wall 1.191368 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.195304 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! inserts ! wall 0.950995 comb 0.950000 user 0.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.589732 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! sets ! wall 1.094941 comb 1.100000 user 1.090000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9) ! mixed ! wall 0.936420 comb 0.940000 user 0.930000 sys 0.010000 (best of 10) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 0.882780 comb 0.870000 user 0.870000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) This puts us ~2x slower than caches without cost accounting. And for read-heavy workloads (the prime use cases for caches), performance is nearly identical. In the worst case (pure write workloads with cost accounting enabled), we're looking at ~1.5us per insert on large caches. That seems "fast enough." Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4505

File last commit:

r35243:490df753 default
r39606:f296c0b3 default
Show More
rewriteutil.py
53 lines | 1.6 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add utility function to check if we can create new unstable cset...
r35242 # rewriteutil.py - utility functions for rewriting changesets
#
# Copyright 2017 Octobus <contact@octobus.net>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add a precheck function to check if revs can be rewritten...
r35243 from .i18n import _
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add utility function to check if we can create new unstable cset...
r35242 from . import (
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add a precheck function to check if revs can be rewritten...
r35243 error,
node,
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add utility function to check if we can create new unstable cset...
r35242 obsolete,
revset,
)
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add a precheck function to check if revs can be rewritten...
r35243 def precheck(repo, revs, action='rewrite'):
"""check if revs can be rewritten
action is used to control the error message.
Make sure this function is called after taking the lock.
"""
if node.nullrev in revs:
msg = _("cannot %s null changeset") % (action)
hint = _("no changeset checked out")
raise error.Abort(msg, hint=hint)
publicrevs = repo.revs('%ld and public()', revs)
if len(repo[None].parents()) > 1:
raise error.Abort(_("cannot %s while merging") % action)
if publicrevs:
msg = _("cannot %s public changesets") % (action)
hint = _("see 'hg help phases' for details")
raise error.Abort(msg, hint=hint)
newunstable = disallowednewunstable(repo, revs)
if newunstable:
raise error.Abort(_("cannot %s changeset with children") % action)
Pulkit Goyal
rewriteutil: add utility function to check if we can create new unstable cset...
r35242 def disallowednewunstable(repo, revs):
"""Checks whether editing the revs will create new unstable changesets and
are we allowed to create them.
To allow new unstable changesets, set the config:
`experimental.evolution.allowunstable=True`
"""
allowunstable = obsolete.isenabled(repo, obsolete.allowunstableopt)
if allowunstable:
return revset.baseset()
return repo.revs("(%ld::) - %ld", revs, revs)