# HG changeset patch
# User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
# Date 2020-12-14 16:22:11
# Node ID ebcc520460968f0076cb41c7af85a09162f8d697
# Parent  6b9d6529848460d3d3bb4b0603bd6d49bb3afa29

hghave: add some official category for known-bad and missing-good output

This will make it simple to tag output that are expected to changes. A simple
hghave integration seems enough but smarter behavior around these seems possible
in the future.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9607

diff --git a/tests/hghave.py b/tests/hghave.py
--- a/tests/hghave.py
+++ b/tests/hghave.py
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ tempprefix = 'hg-hghave-'
 checks = {
     "true": (lambda: True, "yak shaving"),
     "false": (lambda: False, "nail clipper"),
+    "known-bad-output": (lambda: True, "use for currently known bad output"),
+    "missing-correct-output": (lambda: False, "use for missing good output"),
 }
 
 try: