##// END OF EJS Templates
debugcommands: drop base revision from debugindex...
debugcommands: drop base revision from debugindex Revlog index data consists of generic index metadata that will likely be implemented across all storage engines and revlog-specifc metadata. Most tests printing index data only care about the generic fields. This commit drops the printing of the base revision from `hg debugindex`. This value is an implementation detail of revlogs / delta chains. If tests are interested in verifying this implementation detail, `hg debugdeltachain` is a better command. Most tests were skipping over this field anyway. Tests that weren't looked like they were newer. So my guess is we forgot to make them skip the field to match the style of the older tests. This reinforces my belief that the base revision is not worth having in `hg debugindex`. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3027

File last commit:

r37300:009d0283 default
r37300:009d0283 default
Show More
test-changelog-exec.t
57 lines | 1.1 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-changelog-exec.t
#require execbit
b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the
changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test
that that doesn't happen anymore
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo foo > foo
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'
$ echo bar > bar
$ chmod +x bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'
manifest of p2:
$ hg manifest
bar
foo
$ hg up -qC 0
$ echo >> foo
$ hg ci -m 'change foo'
created new head
manifest of p1:
$ hg manifest
foo
$ hg merge
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ chmod +x foo
$ hg ci -m 'merge'
this should not mention bar but should mention foo:
$ hg tip -v
changeset: 3:c53d17ff3380
tag: tip
parent: 2:ed1b79f46b9a
parent: 1:d394a8db219b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: foo
description:
merge
$ hg debugindex bar
rev offset length linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 5 1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000
$ cd ..