##// END OF EJS Templates
phabricator: warn if unable to amend, instead of aborting after posting...
phabricator: warn if unable to amend, instead of aborting after posting There was a divergence in behavior here between obsolete and strip based amending. I first noticed the abort when testing outside of the test harness, but then had trouble recreating it here after reverting the code changes. It turns out, strip based amend was successfully amending the public commit after it was posted! It looks like the protection is in the `commit --amend` command, not in the underlying code that it calls. I considered doing a preflight check and aborting. But the locks are only acquired at the end, if amending, and this is too large a section of code to be wrapped in a maybe-it's-held-or-not context manager for my tastes. Additionally, some people do post-push reviews, and amending is the default behavior, so they shouldn't see a misleading error message. The lack of a 'Differential Revision' entry in the commit message breaks a {phabreview} test, so it had to be partially conditionalized.

File last commit:

r39796:7e99b027 default
r41198:0101a35d default
Show More
test-merge-remove.t
116 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo bar > bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'
$ echo foo2 >> foo
$ echo bleh > bar
$ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'
$ hg up -qC 0
$ hg mv foo foo1
$ echo foo1 > foo1
$ hg cat foo >> foo1
$ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
created new head
$ hg merge
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
m 0 -2 unset bar
m 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -q
M bar
M foo1
Removing foo1 and bar:
$ cp foo1 F
$ cp bar B
$ hg rm -f foo1 bar
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
r 0 -1 set bar
r 0 -1 set foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
R bar
R foo1
Re-adding foo1 and bar:
$ cp F foo1
$ cp B bar
$ hg add -v foo1 bar
adding bar
adding foo1
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
Reverting foo1 and bar:
$ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
saving current version of bar as bar.orig
saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
reverting bar
reverting foo1
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
$ hg diff
Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove
$ rm *
$ hg up -qC
$ hg rm bar
$ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
$ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
$ hg merge
bar: untracked file differs
abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
[255]
$ cat bar
memories of buried pirate treasure
Those who use force will lose
$ hg merge -f
file 'bar' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
What do you want to do?
use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
[1]
$ cat bar
bleh
$ hg st
M bar
M foo1