##// END OF EJS Templates
bookmarks: cache reverse mapping (issue5868)...
bookmarks: cache reverse mapping (issue5868) I chose a simpler implementation. If the initial cost of building reverse mapping is significant, we'll have to move it under @propertycache. The nodemap could be a dict of sets, but I think keeping a sorted list is better since each node is likely to have zero/one bookmark. Micro-benchmark with 1001 bookmarks and 1001 revisions: $ for n in `seq 0 1000`; do touch $n; hg book book$n; hg ci -qAm$n; done $ hg bookmarks --time > /dev/null (orig) time: real 0.040 secs (user 0.050+0.000 sys 0.000+0.000) (new) time: real 0.040 secs (user 0.040+0.000 sys 0.010+0.000) $ hg log -T '{bookmarks}\n' --time > /dev/null (orig) time: real 0.160 secs (user 0.160+0.000 sys 0.000+0.000) (new) time: real 0.090 secs (user 0.100+0.000 sys 0.000+0.000)

File last commit:

r5688:883d887c default
r37869:04ceb267 @26 default
Show More
test-dispatch.py.out
23 lines | 481 B | text/plain | TextLexer
/ tests / test-dispatch.py.out
running: init test1
result: None
running: add foo
result: 0
running: commit -m commit1 -d 2000-01-01 foo
result: None
running: commit -m commit2 -d 2000-01-02 foo
result: None
running: log -r 0
changeset: 0:0e4634943879
user: test
date: Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 2000 +0000
summary: commit1
result: None
running: log -r tip
changeset: 1:45589e459b2e
tag: tip
user: test
date: Sun Jan 02 00:00:00 2000 +0000
summary: commit2
result: None