##// END OF EJS Templates
scmutil: introduce function to check whether repo uses treemanifest or not...
scmutil: introduce function to check whether repo uses treemanifest or not In an upcoming patch, I wanted to check whether current repo uses treemanifest or not. I looked for a function and found that at all places we manually check for the requirement in repo requirements. I guess having a dedicated function for that is much better. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8981

File last commit:

r41072:ce0bc295 default
r46129:10284ce3 default
Show More
TODO.rst
21 lines | 782 B | text/x-rst | RstLexer

Address commentary in manifest.excludedmanifestrevlog.add - specifically we should improve the collaboration with core so that add() never gets called on an excluded directory and we can improve the stand-in to raise a ProgrammingError.

Reason more completely about rename-filtering logic in narrowfilelog. There could be some surprises lurking there.

Formally document the narrowspec format. For bonus points, unify with the server-specified narrowspec format.

narrowrepo.setnarrowpats() or narrowspec.save() need to make sure they're holding the wlock.

The follinwg places do an unrestricted dirstate walk (including files outside the narrowspec). Some of them should perhaps not do that.

  • debugfileset
  • perfwalk
  • sparse (but restricted to sparse config)
  • largefiles