##// END OF EJS Templates
identify: add template support...
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html

File last commit:

r30238:9843e3d9 stable
r33051:15a79ac8 default
Show More
test-journal-share.t
153 lines | 4.5 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-journal-share.t
Journal extension test: tests the share extension support
$ cat >> testmocks.py << EOF
> # mock out util.getuser() and util.makedate() to supply testable values
> import os
> from mercurial import util
> def mockgetuser():
> return 'foobar'
>
> def mockmakedate():
> filename = os.path.join(os.environ['TESTTMP'], 'testtime')
> try:
> with open(filename, 'rb') as timef:
> time = float(timef.read()) + 1
> except IOError:
> time = 0.0
> with open(filename, 'wb') as timef:
> timef.write(str(time))
> return (time, 0)
>
> util.getuser = mockgetuser
> util.makedate = mockmakedate
> EOF
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
> [extensions]
> journal=
> share=
> testmocks=`pwd`/testmocks.py
> [remotenames]
> rename.default=remote
> EOF
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ hg bookmark bm
$ touch file0
$ hg commit -Am file0-added
adding file0
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . commit -Am file0-added
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
A shared working copy initially receives the same bookmarks and working copy
$ cd ..
$ hg share repo shared1
updating working directory
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd shared1
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
unless you explicitly share bookmarks
$ cd ..
$ hg share --bookmarks repo shared2
updating working directory
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
Moving the bookmark in the original repository is only shown in the repository
that shares bookmarks
$ cd ../repo
$ touch file1
$ hg commit -Am file1-added
adding file1
$ cd ../shared1
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
But working copy changes are always 'local'
$ cd ../repo
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark bm)
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . up 0
4f354088b094 . commit -Am file1-added
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . commit -Am file0-added
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
$ hg up tip
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg journal
previous locations of '.':
0fd3805711f9 up 0
4f354088b094 up tip
0fd3805711f9 share --bookmarks repo shared2
Unsharing works as expected; the journal remains consistent
$ cd ../shared1
$ hg unshare
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg unshare
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . up 0
4f354088b094 . up tip
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
New journal entries in the source repo no longer show up in the other working copies
$ cd ../repo
$ hg bookmark newbm -r tip
$ hg journal newbm
previous locations of 'newbm':
4f354088b094 bookmark newbm -r tip
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal newbm
previous locations of 'newbm':
no recorded locations
This applies for both directions
$ hg bookmark shared2bm -r tip
$ hg journal shared2bm
previous locations of 'shared2bm':
4f354088b094 bookmark shared2bm -r tip
$ cd ../repo
$ hg journal shared2bm
previous locations of 'shared2bm':
no recorded locations