##// END OF EJS Templates
identify: add template support...
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html

File last commit:

r16913:f2719b38 default
r33051:15a79ac8 default
Show More
test-pull-pull-corruption.t
72 lines | 1.6 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-pull-pull-corruption.t
Corrupt an hg repo with two pulls.
create one repo with a long history
$ hg init source1
$ cd source1
$ touch foo
$ hg add foo
$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do
> echo $i >> foo
> hg ci -m $i
> done
$ cd ..
create one repo with a shorter history
$ hg clone -r 0 source1 source2
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd source2
$ echo a >> foo
$ hg ci -m a
$ cd ..
create a third repo to pull both other repos into it
$ hg init corrupted
$ cd corrupted
use a hook to make the second pull start while the first one is still running
$ echo '[hooks]' >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo 'prechangegroup = sleep 5' >> .hg/hgrc
start a pull...
$ hg pull ../source1 > pull.out 2>&1 &
... and start another pull before the first one has finished
$ sleep 1
$ hg pull ../source2 2>/dev/null
pulling from ../source2
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ cat pull.out
pulling from ../source1
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 10 changesets with 10 changes to 1 files
(run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
see the result
$ wait
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
1 files, 11 changesets, 11 total revisions
$ cd ..