##// END OF EJS Templates
rebase: also include commit of collapsed commits in single transaction...
rebase: also include commit of collapsed commits in single transaction When rebase.singletransaction is set, we still used to create a second transaction when committing with --collapse. It's simpler to create a single transaction. Note that in the affected .t file, the test that uses --collapse still appears to create two transactions (it prints "rebase status stored" twice). However, only a single transaction is actually created and the second printout comes from cmdutil.commitforceeditor() that explicitly calls tr.writepending(). Also note the that we now roll back any commits if the user closes the commit message editor with an error code (or leaves the message empty). That might be unfortunate, but it's consistent with how we behave in the --no-collapse case (if the user passed --edit). If we want to change that, I think it should be done consistently in a separate patch. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2728

File last commit:

r15168:cfccd3be default
r36945:17a744c5 default
Show More
CONTRIBUTORS
4 lines | 172 B | text/plain | TextLexer
Greg Ward, author of the original bfiles extension
Na'Tosha Bard of Unity Technologies
Fog Creek Software
Special thanks to the University of Toronto and the UCOSP program