##// END OF EJS Templates
clonebundles: advertise clone bundles feature to clients...
clonebundles: advertise clone bundles feature to clients Server operators that have enabled clone bundles probably want clients to use it. This patch introduces a feature that will insert a bundle2 "output" part that advertises the existence of the clone bundles feature to clients that aren't using it. The server uses the "cbattempted" argument to "getbundle" to determine whether a client supports clone bundles and to avoid sending the message to clients that failed the clone bundle for whatever reason.

File last commit:

r22589:9ab18a91 default
r26691:23c0da28 default
Show More
test-merge-prompt.t
150 lines | 3.2 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
Test for
b5605d88dc27: Make ui.prompt repeat on "unrecognized response" again
(issue897)
840e2b315c1f: Fix misleading error and prompts during update/merge
(issue556)
$ status() {
> echo "--- status ---"
> hg st -A file1 file2
> for file in file1 file2; do
> if [ -f $file ]; then
> echo "--- $file ---"
> cat $file
> else
> echo "*** $file does not exist"
> fi
> done
> }
$ hg init
$ echo 1 > file1
$ echo 2 > file2
$ hg ci -Am 'added file1 and file2'
adding file1
adding file2
$ hg rm file1
$ echo changed >> file2
$ hg ci -m 'removed file1, changed file2'
$ hg co 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo changed >> file1
$ hg rm file2
$ hg ci -m 'changed file1, removed file2'
created new head
Non-interactive merge:
$ hg merge -y
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
remote changed file2 which local deleted
use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ status
--- status ---
M file2
C file1
--- file1 ---
1
changed
--- file2 ---
2
changed
Interactive merge:
$ hg co -C
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
> c
> d
> EOF
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
remote changed file2 which local deleted
use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? d
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ status
--- status ---
file2: * (glob)
C file1
--- file1 ---
1
changed
*** file2 does not exist
Interactive merge with bad input:
$ hg co -C
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
> foo
> bar
> d
> baz
> c
> EOF
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? foo
unrecognized response
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? bar
unrecognized response
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
remote changed file2 which local deleted
use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? baz
unrecognized response
remote changed file2 which local deleted
use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ status
--- status ---
M file2
R file1
*** file1 does not exist
--- file2 ---
2
changed
Interactive merge with not enough input:
$ hg co -C
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
> d
> EOF
local changed file1 which remote deleted
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
remote changed file2 which local deleted
use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? abort: response expected
[255]
$ status
--- status ---
file2: * (glob)
C file1
--- file1 ---
1
changed
*** file2 does not exist