##// END OF EJS Templates
interfaces: mark a few dirstate methods abstract...
interfaces: mark a few dirstate methods abstract I'm not sure what's going on here, but when enabling pytype checking on this package, it spits out the following errors: File "/mnt/c/Users/Matt/hg/mercurial/interfaces/dirstate.py", line 136, in changing_parents: bad return type [bad-return-type] Expected: Iterator Actually returned: None Attributes of protocol Iterator are not implemented on None: __next__ File "/mnt/c/Users/Matt/hg/mercurial/interfaces/dirstate.py", line 145, in changing_files: bad return type [bad-return-type] Expected: Iterator Actually returned: None Attributes of protocol Iterator are not implemented on None: __next__ I guess technically that's true, because these methods only have a doc comment, and don't explicitly return something or unconditionally raise an error. The strange thing is that both before and after this change, the *.pyi file that is generated is unchanged, and contains: def changing_files(self, repo) -> contextlib._GeneratorContextManager: ... def changing_parents(self, repo) -> contextlib._GeneratorContextManager: ... I'm not sure if the `@abstractmethod` should be the most inner or most outer decoration. We'll roll the dice with being the innermost, because that's how `@abstractproperty` says it should be used in conjunction with `@property`. We should probably make all of the methods without an actual body abstract, like was done for some `mercurial.wireprototypes` classes in fd200f5bcaea. But let's hold off for now and do that enmass later.

File last commit:

r52756:f4733654 default
r53328:2c8c46c3 default
Show More
diffhelper.py
82 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# diffhelper.py - helper routines for patch
#
# Copyright 2009 Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com> and others
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import annotations
from .i18n import _
from . import (
error,
)
MISSING_NEWLINE_MARKER = b'\\ No newline at end of file\n'
def addlines(fp, hunk, lena, lenb, a, b):
"""Read lines from fp into the hunk
The hunk is parsed into two arrays, a and b. a gets the old state of
the text, b gets the new state. The control char from the hunk is saved
when inserting into a, but not b (for performance while deleting files.)
"""
while True:
todoa = lena - len(a)
todob = lenb - len(b)
num = max(todoa, todob)
if num == 0:
break
for i in range(num):
s = fp.readline()
if not s:
raise error.ParseError(_(b'incomplete hunk'))
if s == MISSING_NEWLINE_MARKER:
fixnewline(hunk, a, b)
continue
if s == b'\n' or s == b'\r\n':
# Some patches may be missing the control char
# on empty lines. Supply a leading space.
s = b' ' + s
hunk.append(s)
if s.startswith(b'+'):
b.append(s[1:])
elif s.startswith(b'-'):
a.append(s)
else:
b.append(s[1:])
a.append(s)
def fixnewline(hunk, a, b):
"""Fix up the last lines of a and b when the patch has no newline at EOF"""
l = hunk[-1]
# tolerate CRLF in last line
if l.endswith(b'\r\n'):
hline = l[:-2]
else:
hline = l[:-1]
if hline.startswith((b' ', b'+')):
b[-1] = hline[1:]
if hline.startswith((b' ', b'-')):
a[-1] = hline
hunk[-1] = hline
def testhunk(a, b, bstart):
"""Compare the lines in a with the lines in b
a is assumed to have a control char at the start of each line, this char
is ignored in the compare.
"""
alen = len(a)
blen = len(b)
if alen > blen - bstart or bstart < 0:
return False
for i in range(alen):
if a[i][1:] != b[i + bstart]:
return False
return True