##// END OF EJS Templates
phases: large rewrite on retract boundary...
phases: large rewrite on retract boundary The new code is still pure Python, so we still have room to going significantly faster. However its complexity of the complex part is `O(|[min_new_draft, tip]|)` instead of `O(|[min_draft, tip]|` which should help tremendously one repository with old draft (like mercurial-devel or mozilla-try). This is especially useful as the most common "retract boundary" operation happens when we commit/rewrite new drafts or when we push new draft to a non-publishing server. In this case, the smallest new_revs is very close to the tip and there is very few work to do. A few smaller optimisation could be done for these cases and will be introduced in later changesets. We still have iterate over large sets of roots, but this is already a great improvement for a very small amount of work. We gather information on the affected changeset as we go as we can put it to use in the next changesets. This extra data collection might slowdown the `register_new` case a bit, however for register_new, it should not really matters. The set of new nodes is either small, so the impact is negligible, or the set of new nodes is large, and the amount of work to do to had them will dominate the overhead the collecting information in `changed_revs`. As this new code compute the changes on the fly, it unlock other interesting improvement to be done in later changeset.

File last commit:

r50179:d44e3c45 default
r52302:2f39c7ae default
Show More
diffhelper.py
81 lines | 2.2 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# diffhelper.py - helper routines for patch
#
# Copyright 2009 Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com> and others
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from .i18n import _
from . import (
error,
)
MISSING_NEWLINE_MARKER = b'\\ No newline at end of file\n'
def addlines(fp, hunk, lena, lenb, a, b):
"""Read lines from fp into the hunk
The hunk is parsed into two arrays, a and b. a gets the old state of
the text, b gets the new state. The control char from the hunk is saved
when inserting into a, but not b (for performance while deleting files.)
"""
while True:
todoa = lena - len(a)
todob = lenb - len(b)
num = max(todoa, todob)
if num == 0:
break
for i in range(num):
s = fp.readline()
if not s:
raise error.ParseError(_(b'incomplete hunk'))
if s == MISSING_NEWLINE_MARKER:
fixnewline(hunk, a, b)
continue
if s == b'\n' or s == b'\r\n':
# Some patches may be missing the control char
# on empty lines. Supply a leading space.
s = b' ' + s
hunk.append(s)
if s.startswith(b'+'):
b.append(s[1:])
elif s.startswith(b'-'):
a.append(s)
else:
b.append(s[1:])
a.append(s)
def fixnewline(hunk, a, b):
"""Fix up the last lines of a and b when the patch has no newline at EOF"""
l = hunk[-1]
# tolerate CRLF in last line
if l.endswith(b'\r\n'):
hline = l[:-2]
else:
hline = l[:-1]
if hline.startswith((b' ', b'+')):
b[-1] = hline[1:]
if hline.startswith((b' ', b'-')):
a[-1] = hline
hunk[-1] = hline
def testhunk(a, b, bstart):
"""Compare the lines in a with the lines in b
a is assumed to have a control char at the start of each line, this char
is ignored in the compare.
"""
alen = len(a)
blen = len(b)
if alen > blen - bstart or bstart < 0:
return False
for i in range(alen):
if a[i][1:] != b[i + bstart]:
return False
return True