##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r28500:2e1bceee default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-bookmarks-current.t
224 lines | 5.0 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-bookmarks-current.t
$ hg init
no bookmarks
$ hg bookmarks
no bookmarks set
set bookmark X
$ hg bookmark X
list bookmarks
$ hg bookmark
* X -1:000000000000
list bookmarks with color
$ hg --config extensions.color= --config color.mode=ansi \
> bookmark --color=always
\x1b[0;32m * \x1b[0m\x1b[0;32mX\x1b[0m\x1b[0;32m -1:000000000000\x1b[0m (esc)
update to bookmark X
$ hg bookmarks
* X -1:000000000000
$ hg update X
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
list bookmarks
$ hg bookmarks
* X -1:000000000000
rename
$ hg bookmark -m X Z
list bookmarks
$ cat .hg/bookmarks.current
Z (no-eol)
$ cat .hg/bookmarks
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Z
$ hg bookmarks
* Z -1:000000000000
new bookmarks X and Y, first one made active
$ hg bookmark Y X
list bookmarks
$ hg bookmark
X -1:000000000000
* Y -1:000000000000
Z -1:000000000000
$ hg bookmark -d X
commit
$ echo 'b' > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m'test'
list bookmarks
$ hg bookmark
* Y 0:719295282060
Z -1:000000000000
Verify that switching to Z updates the active bookmark:
$ hg update Z
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark Z)
$ hg bookmark
Y 0:719295282060
* Z -1:000000000000
Switch back to Y for the remaining tests in this file:
$ hg update Y
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark Y)
delete bookmarks
$ hg bookmark -d Y
$ hg bookmark -d Z
list bookmarks
$ hg bookmark
no bookmarks set
update to tip
$ hg update tip
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
set bookmark Y using -r . but make sure that the active
bookmark is not activated
$ hg bookmark -r . Y
list bookmarks, Y should not be active
$ hg bookmark
Y 0:719295282060
now, activate Y
$ hg up -q Y
set bookmark Z using -i
$ hg bookmark -r . -i Z
$ hg bookmarks
* Y 0:719295282060
Z 0:719295282060
deactivate active bookmark using -i
$ hg bookmark -i Y
$ hg bookmarks
Y 0:719295282060
Z 0:719295282060
$ hg up -q Y
$ hg bookmark -i
$ hg bookmarks
Y 0:719295282060
Z 0:719295282060
$ hg bookmark -i
no active bookmark
$ hg up -q Y
$ hg bookmarks
* Y 0:719295282060
Z 0:719295282060
deactivate active bookmark while renaming
$ hg bookmark -i -m Y X
$ hg bookmarks
X 0:719295282060
Z 0:719295282060
bare update moves the active bookmark forward and clear the divergent bookmarks
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -Am1
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg ci -Am2
$ hg bookmark X@1 -r 1
$ hg bookmark X@2 -r 2
$ hg update X
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark X)
$ hg bookmarks
* X 0:719295282060
X@1 1:cc586d725fbe
X@2 2:49e1c4e84c58
Z 0:719295282060
$ hg update
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
updating bookmark X
$ hg bookmarks
* X 2:49e1c4e84c58
Z 0:719295282060
test deleting .hg/bookmarks.current when explicitly updating
to a revision
$ echo a >> b
$ hg ci -m.
$ hg up -q X
$ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
try to update to it again to make sure we don't
set and then unset it
$ hg up -q X
$ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
$ hg up -q 1
$ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
[1]
when a bookmark is active, hg up -r . is
analogous to hg book -i <active bookmark>
$ hg up -q X
$ hg up -q .
$ test -f .hg/bookmarks.current
[1]
issue 4552 -- simulate a pull moving the active bookmark
$ hg up -q X
$ printf "Z" > .hg/bookmarks.current
$ hg log -T '{activebookmark}\n' -r Z
Z
$ hg log -T '{bookmarks % "{active}\n"}' -r Z
Z
test that updating to closed branch head also advances active bookmark
$ hg commit --close-branch -m "closed"
$ hg update -q ".^1"
$ hg bookmark Y
$ hg bookmarks
X 3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
* Y 3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
Z 0:719295282060
$ hg update
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
updating bookmark Y
$ hg bookmarks
X 3:4d6bd4bfb1ae
* Y 4:8fa964221e8e
Z 0:719295282060
$ hg parents -q
4:8fa964221e8e