##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r16913:f2719b38 default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-empty-file.t
47 lines | 1.1 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ touch empty1
$ hg add empty1
$ hg commit -m 'add empty1'
$ touch empty2
$ hg add empty2
$ hg commit -m 'add empty2'
$ hg up -C 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ touch empty3
$ hg add empty3
$ hg commit -m 'add empty3'
created new head
$ hg heads
changeset: 2:a1cb177e0d44
tag: tip
parent: 0:1e1d9c4e5b64
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add empty3
changeset: 1:097d2b0e17f6
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add empty2
$ hg merge 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
Before changeset 05257fd28591, we didn't notice the
empty file that came from rev 1:
$ hg status
M empty2
$ hg commit -m merge
$ hg manifest --debug tip
b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644 empty1
b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644 empty2
b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644 empty3
$ cd ..