##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r27599:ad5966de default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-merge-remove.t
115 lines | 2.2 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo bar > bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'
$ echo foo2 >> foo
$ echo bleh > bar
$ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'
$ hg up -qC 0
$ hg mv foo foo1
$ echo foo1 > foo1
$ hg cat foo >> foo1
$ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
created new head
$ hg merge
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg debugstate --nodates
m 0 -2 unset bar
m 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -q
M bar
M foo1
Removing foo1 and bar:
$ cp foo1 F
$ cp bar B
$ hg rm -f foo1 bar
$ hg debugstate --nodates
r 0 -1 set bar
r 0 -1 set foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
R bar
R foo1
Re-adding foo1 and bar:
$ cp F foo1
$ cp B bar
$ hg add -v foo1 bar
adding bar
adding foo1
$ hg debugstate --nodates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
Reverting foo1 and bar:
$ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
saving current version of bar as bar.orig
reverting bar
saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
reverting foo1
$ hg debugstate --nodates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
$ hg diff
Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove
$ rm *
$ hg up -qC
$ hg rm bar
$ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
$ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
$ hg merge
bar: untracked file differs
abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
[255]
$ cat bar
memories of buried pirate treasure
Those who use force will lose
$ hg merge -f
remote changed bar which local deleted
use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
$ cat bar
bleh
$ hg st
M bar
M foo1