##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r26618:8e6d5b73 default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-merge9.t
94 lines | 1.7 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
test that we don't interrupt the merge session if
a file-level merge failed
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo a > bar
$ hg ci -Am 'add foo'
adding bar
adding foo
$ hg mv foo baz
$ echo b >> bar
$ echo quux > quux1
$ hg ci -Am 'mv foo baz'
adding quux1
$ hg up -qC 0
$ echo >> foo
$ echo c >> bar
$ echo quux > quux2
$ hg ci -Am 'change foo'
adding quux2
created new head
test with the rename on the remote side
$ HGMERGE=false hg merge
merging bar
merging foo and baz to baz
merging bar failed!
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
test with the rename on the local side
$ hg up -C 1
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ HGMERGE=false hg merge
merging bar
merging baz and foo to baz
merging bar failed!
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
show unresolved
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
unmark baz
$ hg resolve -u baz
show
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
U baz
$ hg st
M bar
M baz
M quux2
? bar.orig
re-resolve baz
$ hg resolve baz
merging baz and foo to baz
after resolve
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
resolve all warning
$ hg resolve
abort: no files or directories specified
(use --all to re-merge all unresolved files)
[255]
resolve all
$ hg resolve -a
merging bar
warning: conflicts while merging bar! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
[1]
after
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
$ cd ..