##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r15194:0705f2ac default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-patch.t
89 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
> import sys
> print 'Using custom patch'
> if '--binary' in sys.argv:
> print '--binary found !'
> EOF
$ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a > a
$ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
$ cd ..
This test checks that:
- custom patch commands with arguments actually work
- patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
--binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
--binary is added by default under win32.
check custom patch options are honored
$ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
$ hg clone -r 0 a b
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
applying ../a.diff
Using custom patch
applied to working directory
Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description
Prepare source repo and patch:
$ rm $HGRCPATH
$ hg init c
$ cd c
$ printf "a\rc" > a
$ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
$ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
$ cat << eof > log
> first line which can't start with '# '
> # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
> A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
> eof
$ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
$ hg export -o p 1
$ cd ..
Clone and apply patch:
$ hg clone -r 0 c d
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd d
$ hg import ../c/p
applying ../c/p
$ hg log -v -r 1
changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: a
description:
first line which can't start with '# '
# second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
# HG changeset patch
# User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
$ cd ..