##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r28274:5d9578d9 default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-pull-update.t
214 lines | 5.2 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
adding foo
$ cd ..
$ hg clone t tt
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd tt
$ echo 1.1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
$ cd ../t
$ echo 1.2 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
Should not update to the other topological branch:
$ hg pull -u ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
1 other heads for branch "default"
$ cd ../tt
Should not update to the other branch:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
1 other heads for branch "default"
$ HGMERGE=true hg merge
merging foo
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -mm
$ cd ../t
Should work:
$ hg pull -u ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (-1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Similarity between "hg update" and "hg pull -u" in handling bookmark
====================================================================
Test that updating activates the bookmark, which matches with the
explicit destination of the update.
$ echo 4 >> foo
$ hg commit -m "#4"
$ hg bookmark active-after-pull
$ cd ../tt
(1) activating by --rev BOOKMARK
$ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
$ hg bookmarks
* active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ hg pull -u -r active-after-pull
pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
adding remote bookmark active-after-pull
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark active-after-pull)
$ hg parents -q
4:f815b3da6163
$ hg bookmarks
* active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163
active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
(discard pulled changes)
$ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
$ hg rollback -q
(2) activating by URL#BOOKMARK
$ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
$ hg bookmarks
* active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#active-after-pull
pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
adding remote bookmark active-after-pull
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark active-after-pull)
$ hg parents -q
4:f815b3da6163
$ hg bookmarks
* active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163
active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
(discard pulled changes)
$ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
$ hg rollback -q
Test that updating deactivates current active bookmark, if the
destination of the update is explicitly specified, and it doesn't
match with the name of any exsiting bookmarks.
$ cd ../t
$ hg bookmark -d active-after-pull
$ hg branch bar -q
$ hg commit -m "#5 (bar #1)"
$ cd ../tt
(1) deactivating by --rev REV
$ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
$ hg bookmarks
* active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ hg pull -u -r b5e4babfaaa7
pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark active-before-pull)
$ hg parents -q
5:b5e4babfaaa7
$ hg bookmarks
active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
(discard pulled changes)
$ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
$ hg rollback -q
(2) deactivating by --branch BRANCH
$ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
$ hg bookmarks
* active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ hg pull -u -b bar
pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark active-before-pull)
$ hg parents -q
5:b5e4babfaaa7
$ hg bookmarks
active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
(discard pulled changes)
$ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
$ hg rollback -q
(3) deactivating by URL#ANOTHER-BRANCH
$ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
$ hg bookmarks
* active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#bar
pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark active-before-pull)
$ hg parents -q
5:b5e4babfaaa7
$ hg bookmarks
active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309
$ cd ..