##// END OF EJS Templates
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported...
sslutil: require TLS 1.1+ when supported Currently, Mercurial will use TLS 1.0 or newer when connecting to remote servers, selecting the highest TLS version supported by both peers. On older Pythons, only TLS 1.0 is available. On newer Pythons, TLS 1.1 and 1.2 should be available. Security professionals recommend avoiding TLS 1.0 if possible. PCI DSS 3.1 "strongly encourages" the use of TLS 1.2. Known attacks like BEAST and POODLE exist against TLS 1.0 (although mitigations are available and properly configured servers aren't vulnerable). I asked Eric Rescorla - Mozilla's resident crypto expert - whether Mercurial should drop support for TLS 1.0. His response was "if you can get away with it." Essentially, a number of servers on the Internet don't support TLS 1.1+. This is why web browsers continue to support TLS 1.0 despite desires from security experts. This patch changes Mercurial's default behavior on modern Python versions to require TLS 1.1+, thus avoiding known security issues with TLS 1.0 and making Mercurial more secure by default. Rather than drop TLS 1.0 support wholesale, we still allow TLS 1.0 to be used if configured. This is a compromise solution - ideally we'd disallow TLS 1.0. However, since we're not sure how many Mercurial servers don't support TLS 1.1+ and we're not sure how much user inconvenience this change will bring, I think it is prudent to ship an escape hatch that still allows usage of TLS 1.0. In the default case our users get better security. In the worst case, they are no worse off than before this patch. This patch has no effect when running on Python versions that don't support TLS 1.1+. As the added test shows, connecting to a server that doesn't support TLS 1.1+ will display a warning message with a link to our wiki, where we can guide people to configure their client to allow less secure connections.

File last commit:

r27161:296d55de default
r29560:303e9300 default
Show More
test-rename-merge1.t
188 lines | 4.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-rename-merge1.t
$ hg init
$ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo foo > a
$ echo foo > a2
$ hg add a a2
$ hg ci -m "start"
$ hg mv a b
$ hg mv a2 b2
$ hg ci -m "rename"
$ hg co 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo blahblah > a
$ echo blahblah > a2
$ hg mv a2 c2
$ hg ci -m "modify"
created new head
$ hg merge -y --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
c2
unmatched files in other:
b
b2
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
c2
b2
preserving a for resolve of b
removing a
b2: remote created -> g
getting b2
b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
merging a and b to b
my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
premerge successful
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -AC
M b
a
M b2
R a
C c2
$ cat b
blahblah
$ hg ci -m "merge"
$ hg debugindex b
rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re)
0 0 67 ..... 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
1 67 72 ..... 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f (re)
$ hg debugrename b
b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66
This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg cp b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
$ hg up eb92d88a9712
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm b3 b4
$ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'
We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg mv b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
$ hg up c761c6948de0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Check for issue2642
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1 # backport
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ hg ci -qm3
$ hg merge 2
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c0
$ cd ..
Check for issue2089
$ hg init repo2089
$ cd repo2089
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ echo c2 > f1
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 1 -q
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -Aqm3
$ hg up 2 -q
$ hg merge 3
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c2
$ cd ..
Check for issue3074
$ hg init repo3074
$ cd repo3074
$ echo foo > file
$ hg add file
$ hg commit -m "added file"
$ hg mv file newfile
$ hg commit -m "renamed file"
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm file
$ hg commit -m "deleted file"
created new head
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
newfile
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
newfile
newfile: remote created -> g
getting newfile
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status
M newfile
$ cd ..