##// END OF EJS Templates
sshpeer: initial definition and implementation of new SSH protocol...
sshpeer: initial definition and implementation of new SSH protocol The existing SSH protocol has several design flaws. Future commits will elaborate on these flaws as new features are introduced to combat these flaws. For now, hopefully you can take me for my word that a ground up rewrite of the SSH protocol is needed. This commit lays the foundation for a new SSH protocol by defining a mechanism to upgrade the SSH transport channel away from the default (version 1) protocol to something modern (which we'll call "version 2" for now). This upgrade process is detailed in the internals documentation for the wire protocol. The gist of it is the client sends a request line preceding the "hello" command/line which basically says "I'm requesting an upgrade: here's what I support." If the server recognizes that line, it processes the upgrade request and the transport channel is switched to use the new version of the protocol. If not, it sends an empty response, which is how all Mercurial SSH servers from the beginning of time reacted to unknown commands. The upgrade request is effectively ignored and the client continues to use the existing version of the protocol as if nothing happened. The new version of the SSH protocol is completely identical to version 1 aside from the upgrade dance and the bytes that follow. The immediate bytes that follow the protocol switch are defined to be a length framed "capabilities: " line containing the remote's advertised capabilities. In reality, this looks very similar to what the "hello" response would look like. But it will evolve quickly. The methodology by which the protocol will evolve is important. I'm not going to introduce the new protocol all at once. That would likely lead to endless bike shedding and forward progress would stall. Instead, I intend to tricle out new features and diversions from the existing protocol in small, incremental changes. To support the gradual evolution of the protocol, the on-the-wire advertised protocol name contains an "exp" to denote "experimental" and a 4 digit field to capture the sub-version of the protocol. Whenever we make a BC change to the wire protocol, we can increment this version and lock out all older clients because it will appear as a completely different protocol version. This means we can incur as many breaking changes as we want. We don't have to commit to supporting any one feature or idea for a long period of time. We can even evolve the handshake mechanism, because that is defined as being an implementation detail of the negotiated protocol version! Hopefully this lowers the barrier to accepting changes to the protocol and for experimenting with "radical" ideas during its development. In core, sshpeer received most of the attention. We haven't even implemented the server bits for the new protocol in core yet. Instead, we add very primitive support to our test server, mainly just to exercise the added code paths in sshpeer. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2061 # no-check-commit because of required foo_bar naming

File last commit:

r35128:8287df8b default
r35994:48a3a928 default
Show More
hbisect.py
300 lines | 10.4 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# changelog bisection for mercurial
#
# Copyright 2007 Matt Mackall
# Copyright 2005, 2006 Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
#
# Inspired by git bisect, extension skeleton taken from mq.py.
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
import collections
from .i18n import _
from .node import (
hex,
short,
)
from . import (
error,
)
def bisect(repo, state):
"""find the next node (if any) for testing during a bisect search.
returns a (nodes, number, good) tuple.
'nodes' is the final result of the bisect if 'number' is 0.
Otherwise 'number' indicates the remaining possible candidates for
the search and 'nodes' contains the next bisect target.
'good' is True if bisect is searching for a first good changeset, False
if searching for a first bad one.
"""
changelog = repo.changelog
clparents = changelog.parentrevs
skip = set([changelog.rev(n) for n in state['skip']])
def buildancestors(bad, good):
badrev = min([changelog.rev(n) for n in bad])
ancestors = collections.defaultdict(lambda: None)
for rev in repo.revs("descendants(%ln) - ancestors(%ln)", good, good):
ancestors[rev] = []
if ancestors[badrev] is None:
return badrev, None
return badrev, ancestors
good = False
badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['bad'], state['good'])
if not ancestors: # looking for bad to good transition?
good = True
badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['good'], state['bad'])
bad = changelog.node(badrev)
if not ancestors: # now we're confused
if (len(state['bad']) == 1 and len(state['good']) == 1 and
state['bad'] != state['good']):
raise error.Abort(_("starting revisions are not directly related"))
raise error.Abort(_("inconsistent state, %s:%s is good and bad")
% (badrev, short(bad)))
# build children dict
children = {}
visit = collections.deque([badrev])
candidates = []
while visit:
rev = visit.popleft()
if ancestors[rev] == []:
candidates.append(rev)
for prev in clparents(rev):
if prev != -1:
if prev in children:
children[prev].append(rev)
else:
children[prev] = [rev]
visit.append(prev)
candidates.sort()
# have we narrowed it down to one entry?
# or have all other possible candidates besides 'bad' have been skipped?
tot = len(candidates)
unskipped = [c for c in candidates if (c not in skip) and (c != badrev)]
if tot == 1 or not unskipped:
return ([changelog.node(c) for c in candidates], 0, good)
perfect = tot // 2
# find the best node to test
best_rev = None
best_len = -1
poison = set()
for rev in candidates:
if rev in poison:
# poison children
poison.update(children.get(rev, []))
continue
a = ancestors[rev] or [rev]
ancestors[rev] = None
x = len(a) # number of ancestors
y = tot - x # number of non-ancestors
value = min(x, y) # how good is this test?
if value > best_len and rev not in skip:
best_len = value
best_rev = rev
if value == perfect: # found a perfect candidate? quit early
break
if y < perfect and rev not in skip: # all downhill from here?
# poison children
poison.update(children.get(rev, []))
continue
for c in children.get(rev, []):
if ancestors[c]:
ancestors[c] = list(set(ancestors[c] + a))
else:
ancestors[c] = a + [c]
assert best_rev is not None
best_node = changelog.node(best_rev)
return ([best_node], tot, good)
def extendrange(repo, state, nodes, good):
# bisect is incomplete when it ends on a merge node and
# one of the parent was not checked.
parents = repo[nodes[0]].parents()
if len(parents) > 1:
if good:
side = state['bad']
else:
side = state['good']
num = len(set(i.node() for i in parents) & set(side))
if num == 1:
return parents[0].ancestor(parents[1])
return None
def load_state(repo):
state = {'current': [], 'good': [], 'bad': [], 'skip': []}
for l in repo.vfs.tryreadlines("bisect.state"):
kind, node = l[:-1].split()
node = repo.lookup(node)
if kind not in state:
raise error.Abort(_("unknown bisect kind %s") % kind)
state[kind].append(node)
return state
def save_state(repo, state):
f = repo.vfs("bisect.state", "w", atomictemp=True)
with repo.wlock():
for kind in sorted(state):
for node in state[kind]:
f.write("%s %s\n" % (kind, hex(node)))
f.close()
def resetstate(repo):
"""remove any bisect state from the repository"""
if repo.vfs.exists("bisect.state"):
repo.vfs.unlink("bisect.state")
def checkstate(state):
"""check we have both 'good' and 'bad' to define a range
Raise Abort exception otherwise."""
if state['good'] and state['bad']:
return True
if not state['good']:
raise error.Abort(_('cannot bisect (no known good revisions)'))
else:
raise error.Abort(_('cannot bisect (no known bad revisions)'))
def get(repo, status):
"""
Return a list of revision(s) that match the given status:
- ``good``, ``bad``, ``skip``: csets explicitly marked as good/bad/skip
- ``goods``, ``bads`` : csets topologically good/bad
- ``range`` : csets taking part in the bisection
- ``pruned`` : csets that are goods, bads or skipped
- ``untested`` : csets whose fate is yet unknown
- ``ignored`` : csets ignored due to DAG topology
- ``current`` : the cset currently being bisected
"""
state = load_state(repo)
if status in ('good', 'bad', 'skip', 'current'):
return map(repo.changelog.rev, state[status])
else:
# In the following sets, we do *not* call 'bisect()' with more
# than one level of recursion, because that can be very, very
# time consuming. Instead, we always develop the expression as
# much as possible.
# 'range' is all csets that make the bisection:
# - have a good ancestor and a bad descendant, or conversely
# that's because the bisection can go either way
range = '( bisect(bad)::bisect(good) | bisect(good)::bisect(bad) )'
_t = repo.revs('bisect(good)::bisect(bad)')
# The sets of topologically good or bad csets
if len(_t) == 0:
# Goods are topologically after bads
goods = 'bisect(good)::' # Pruned good csets
bads = '::bisect(bad)' # Pruned bad csets
else:
# Goods are topologically before bads
goods = '::bisect(good)' # Pruned good csets
bads = 'bisect(bad)::' # Pruned bad csets
# 'pruned' is all csets whose fate is already known: good, bad, skip
skips = 'bisect(skip)' # Pruned skipped csets
pruned = '( (%s) | (%s) | (%s) )' % (goods, bads, skips)
# 'untested' is all cset that are- in 'range', but not in 'pruned'
untested = '( (%s) - (%s) )' % (range, pruned)
# 'ignored' is all csets that were not used during the bisection
# due to DAG topology, but may however have had an impact.
# E.g., a branch merged between bads and goods, but whose branch-
# point is out-side of the range.
iba = '::bisect(bad) - ::bisect(good)' # Ignored bads' ancestors
iga = '::bisect(good) - ::bisect(bad)' # Ignored goods' ancestors
ignored = '( ( (%s) | (%s) ) - (%s) )' % (iba, iga, range)
if status == 'range':
return repo.revs(range)
elif status == 'pruned':
return repo.revs(pruned)
elif status == 'untested':
return repo.revs(untested)
elif status == 'ignored':
return repo.revs(ignored)
elif status == "goods":
return repo.revs(goods)
elif status == "bads":
return repo.revs(bads)
else:
raise error.ParseError(_('invalid bisect state'))
def label(repo, node):
rev = repo.changelog.rev(node)
# Try explicit sets
if rev in get(repo, 'good'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('good')
if rev in get(repo, 'bad'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('bad')
if rev in get(repo, 'skip'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('skipped')
if rev in get(repo, 'untested') or rev in get(repo, 'current'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('untested')
if rev in get(repo, 'ignored'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('ignored')
# Try implicit sets
if rev in get(repo, 'goods'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('good (implicit)')
if rev in get(repo, 'bads'):
# i18n: bisect changeset status
return _('bad (implicit)')
return None
def shortlabel(label):
if label:
return label[0].upper()
return None
def printresult(ui, repo, state, displayer, nodes, good):
if len(nodes) == 1:
# narrowed it down to a single revision
if good:
ui.write(_("The first good revision is:\n"))
else:
ui.write(_("The first bad revision is:\n"))
displayer.show(repo[nodes[0]])
extendnode = extendrange(repo, state, nodes, good)
if extendnode is not None:
ui.write(_('Not all ancestors of this changeset have been'
' checked.\nUse bisect --extend to continue the '
'bisection from\nthe common ancestor, %s.\n')
% extendnode)
else:
# multiple possible revisions
if good:
ui.write(_("Due to skipped revisions, the first "
"good revision could be any of:\n"))
else:
ui.write(_("Due to skipped revisions, the first "
"bad revision could be any of:\n"))
for n in nodes:
displayer.show(repo[n])
displayer.close()