##// END OF EJS Templates
sshpeer: initial definition and implementation of new SSH protocol...
sshpeer: initial definition and implementation of new SSH protocol The existing SSH protocol has several design flaws. Future commits will elaborate on these flaws as new features are introduced to combat these flaws. For now, hopefully you can take me for my word that a ground up rewrite of the SSH protocol is needed. This commit lays the foundation for a new SSH protocol by defining a mechanism to upgrade the SSH transport channel away from the default (version 1) protocol to something modern (which we'll call "version 2" for now). This upgrade process is detailed in the internals documentation for the wire protocol. The gist of it is the client sends a request line preceding the "hello" command/line which basically says "I'm requesting an upgrade: here's what I support." If the server recognizes that line, it processes the upgrade request and the transport channel is switched to use the new version of the protocol. If not, it sends an empty response, which is how all Mercurial SSH servers from the beginning of time reacted to unknown commands. The upgrade request is effectively ignored and the client continues to use the existing version of the protocol as if nothing happened. The new version of the SSH protocol is completely identical to version 1 aside from the upgrade dance and the bytes that follow. The immediate bytes that follow the protocol switch are defined to be a length framed "capabilities: " line containing the remote's advertised capabilities. In reality, this looks very similar to what the "hello" response would look like. But it will evolve quickly. The methodology by which the protocol will evolve is important. I'm not going to introduce the new protocol all at once. That would likely lead to endless bike shedding and forward progress would stall. Instead, I intend to tricle out new features and diversions from the existing protocol in small, incremental changes. To support the gradual evolution of the protocol, the on-the-wire advertised protocol name contains an "exp" to denote "experimental" and a 4 digit field to capture the sub-version of the protocol. Whenever we make a BC change to the wire protocol, we can increment this version and lock out all older clients because it will appear as a completely different protocol version. This means we can incur as many breaking changes as we want. We don't have to commit to supporting any one feature or idea for a long period of time. We can even evolve the handshake mechanism, because that is defined as being an implementation detail of the negotiated protocol version! Hopefully this lowers the barrier to accepting changes to the protocol and for experimenting with "radical" ideas during its development. In core, sshpeer received most of the attention. We haven't even implemented the server bits for the new protocol in core yet. Instead, we add very primitive support to our test server, mainly just to exercise the added code paths in sshpeer. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2061 # no-check-commit because of required foo_bar naming

File last commit:

r32200:4462a981 default
r35994:48a3a928 default
Show More
pvec.py
214 lines | 5.9 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# pvec.py - probabilistic vector clocks for Mercurial
#
# Copyright 2012 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
'''
A "pvec" is a changeset property based on the theory of vector clocks
that can be compared to discover relatedness without consulting a
graph. This can be useful for tasks like determining how a
disconnected patch relates to a repository.
Currently a pvec consist of 448 bits, of which 24 are 'depth' and the
remainder are a bit vector. It is represented as a 70-character base85
string.
Construction:
- a root changeset has a depth of 0 and a bit vector based on its hash
- a normal commit has a changeset where depth is increased by one and
one bit vector bit is flipped based on its hash
- a merge changeset pvec is constructed by copying changes from one pvec into
the other to balance its depth
Properties:
- for linear changes, difference in depth is always <= hamming distance
- otherwise, changes are probably divergent
- when hamming distance is < 200, we can reliably detect when pvecs are near
Issues:
- hamming distance ceases to work over distances of ~ 200
- detecting divergence is less accurate when the common ancestor is very close
to either revision or total distance is high
- this could probably be improved by modeling the relation between
delta and hdist
Uses:
- a patch pvec can be used to locate the nearest available common ancestor for
resolving conflicts
- ordering of patches can be established without a DAG
- two head pvecs can be compared to determine whether push/pull/merge is needed
and approximately how many changesets are involved
- can be used to find a heuristic divergence measure between changesets on
different branches
'''
from __future__ import absolute_import
from .node import nullrev
from . import (
util,
)
_size = 448 # 70 chars b85-encoded
_bytes = _size / 8
_depthbits = 24
_depthbytes = _depthbits / 8
_vecbytes = _bytes - _depthbytes
_vecbits = _vecbytes * 8
_radius = (_vecbits - 30) / 2 # high probability vectors are related
def _bin(bs):
'''convert a bytestring to a long'''
v = 0
for b in bs:
v = v * 256 + ord(b)
return v
def _str(v, l):
bs = ""
for p in xrange(l):
bs = chr(v & 255) + bs
v >>= 8
return bs
def _split(b):
'''depth and bitvec'''
return _bin(b[:_depthbytes]), _bin(b[_depthbytes:])
def _join(depth, bitvec):
return _str(depth, _depthbytes) + _str(bitvec, _vecbytes)
def _hweight(x):
c = 0
while x:
if x & 1:
c += 1
x >>= 1
return c
_htab = [_hweight(x) for x in xrange(256)]
def _hamming(a, b):
'''find the hamming distance between two longs'''
d = a ^ b
c = 0
while d:
c += _htab[d & 0xff]
d >>= 8
return c
def _mergevec(x, y, c):
# Ideally, this function would be x ^ y ^ ancestor, but finding
# ancestors is a nuisance. So instead we find the minimal number
# of changes to balance the depth and hamming distance
d1, v1 = x
d2, v2 = y
if d1 < d2:
d1, d2, v1, v2 = d2, d1, v2, v1
hdist = _hamming(v1, v2)
ddist = d1 - d2
v = v1
m = v1 ^ v2 # mask of different bits
i = 1
if hdist > ddist:
# if delta = 10 and hdist = 100, then we need to go up 55 steps
# to the ancestor and down 45
changes = (hdist - ddist + 1) / 2
else:
# must make at least one change
changes = 1
depth = d1 + changes
# copy changes from v2
if m:
while changes:
if m & i:
v ^= i
changes -= 1
i <<= 1
else:
v = _flipbit(v, c)
return depth, v
def _flipbit(v, node):
# converting bit strings to longs is slow
bit = (hash(node) & 0xffffffff) % _vecbits
return v ^ (1<<bit)
def ctxpvec(ctx):
'''construct a pvec for ctx while filling in the cache'''
r = ctx.repo()
if not util.safehasattr(r, "_pveccache"):
r._pveccache = {}
pvc = r._pveccache
if ctx.rev() not in pvc:
cl = r.changelog
for n in xrange(ctx.rev() + 1):
if n not in pvc:
node = cl.node(n)
p1, p2 = cl.parentrevs(n)
if p1 == nullrev:
# start with a 'random' vector at root
pvc[n] = (0, _bin((node * 3)[:_vecbytes]))
elif p2 == nullrev:
d, v = pvc[p1]
pvc[n] = (d + 1, _flipbit(v, node))
else:
pvc[n] = _mergevec(pvc[p1], pvc[p2], node)
bs = _join(*pvc[ctx.rev()])
return pvec(util.b85encode(bs))
class pvec(object):
def __init__(self, hashorctx):
if isinstance(hashorctx, str):
self._bs = hashorctx
self._depth, self._vec = _split(util.b85decode(hashorctx))
else:
self._vec = ctxpvec(hashorctx)
def __str__(self):
return self._bs
def __eq__(self, b):
return self._vec == b._vec and self._depth == b._depth
def __lt__(self, b):
delta = b._depth - self._depth
if delta < 0:
return False # always correct
if _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) > delta:
return False
return True
def __gt__(self, b):
return b < self
def __or__(self, b):
delta = abs(b._depth - self._depth)
if _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) <= delta:
return False
return True
def __sub__(self, b):
if self | b:
raise ValueError("concurrent pvecs")
return self._depth - b._depth
def distance(self, b):
d = abs(b._depth - self._depth)
h = _hamming(self._vec, b._vec)
return max(d, h)
def near(self, b):
dist = abs(b.depth - self._depth)
if dist > _radius or _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) > _radius:
return False