##// END OF EJS Templates
merge: add missing ACTION_KEEP when both remote and ancestor are not present...
merge: add missing ACTION_KEEP when both remote and ancestor are not present Previous patch may lead to confusion that the related criss-cross merge is consistent when done from any of the parents. However this is not true and we were missing setting an ACTION_KEEP. This patch now exposes that bid-merge favors ACTION_KEEP always and the result of merge is different when started from different parents. This change also effects a test case above where bid merge was wrongly picking `r` because it was missing keep related information from one of the ancestor. After this test, we are back in a state in the criss-cross merge tests where the result depends on which parent we are merging from. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8941

File last commit:

r28712:80e92247 default
r46041:49ffaa4f default
Show More
bookmarks.tmpl
11 lines | 372 B | application/x-cheetah | CheetahLexer
{header}
<id>{urlbase}{url|urlescape}</id>
<link rel="self" href="{urlbase}{url|urlescape}atom-bookmarks"/>
<link rel="alternate" href="{urlbase}{url|urlescape}bookmarks"/>
<title>{repo|escape}: bookmarks</title>
<summary>{repo|escape} bookmark history</summary>
<author><name>Mercurial SCM</name></author>
{lastchange%feedupdated}
{entries%bookmarkentry}
</feed>