##// END OF EJS Templates
exchange: ensure all outgoing subrepo references are present before pushing...
exchange: ensure all outgoing subrepo references are present before pushing We've run into occasional problems with people committing a repo, and then amending or rebasing in the subrepo. That makes it so that the revision in the parent can't be checked out, and the problem gets propagated on push. Mercurial already tries to defend against this sort of dangling reference by pushing *all* subrepo revisions first. This reuses the checks that trigger warnings in `hg verify` to bail on the push unless using `--force`. I thought about putting this on the server side, but at that point, all of the data has been transferred, only to bail out. Additionally, SCM Manager hosts subrepos in a location that isn't nested in the parent, so normal subrepo code would complain that the subrepo is missing when run on the server. Because the push command pushes subrepos before calling this exchange code, a subrepo will be pushed before the parent is verified. Not great, but no dangling references are exchanged, so it solves the problem. This code isn't in the loop that pushes the subrepos because: 1) the list of outgoing revisions is needed to limit the scope of the check 2) the loop only accesses the current revision, and therefore can miss subrepos that were dropped in previous commits 3) this code is called when pushing a subrepo, so the protection is recursive I'm not sure if there's a cheap check for the list of files in the outgoing bundle. If there is, that would provide a fast path to bypass this check for people not using subrepos (or if no subrepo changes were made). There's probably also room for verifying other references like tags. But since that doesn't break checkouts, it's much less of a problem. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7616

File last commit:

r43109:ce6797ef default
r44365:4b7d5d10 default
Show More
dagops.rs
275 lines | 8.8 KiB | application/rls-services+xml | RustLexer
// dagops.rs
//
// Copyright 2019 Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net>
//
// This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
// GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
//! Miscellaneous DAG operations
//!
//! # Terminology
//! - By *relative heads* of a collection of revision numbers (`Revision`), we
//! mean those revisions that have no children among the collection.
//! - Similarly *relative roots* of a collection of `Revision`, we mean those
//! whose parents, if any, don't belong to the collection.
use super::{Graph, GraphError, Revision, NULL_REVISION};
use crate::ancestors::AncestorsIterator;
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashSet};
fn remove_parents(
graph: &impl Graph,
rev: Revision,
set: &mut HashSet<Revision>,
) -> Result<(), GraphError> {
for parent in graph.parents(rev)?.iter() {
if *parent != NULL_REVISION {
set.remove(parent);
}
}
Ok(())
}
/// Relative heads out of some revisions, passed as an iterator.
///
/// These heads are defined as those revisions that have no children
/// among those emitted by the iterator.
///
/// # Performance notes
/// Internally, this clones the iterator, and builds a `HashSet` out of it.
///
/// This function takes an `Iterator` instead of `impl IntoIterator` to
/// guarantee that cloning the iterator doesn't result in cloning the full
/// construct it comes from.
pub fn heads<'a>(
graph: &impl Graph,
iter_revs: impl Clone + Iterator<Item = &'a Revision>,
) -> Result<HashSet<Revision>, GraphError> {
let mut heads: HashSet<Revision> = iter_revs.clone().cloned().collect();
heads.remove(&NULL_REVISION);
for rev in iter_revs {
if *rev != NULL_REVISION {
remove_parents(graph, *rev, &mut heads)?;
}
}
Ok(heads)
}
/// Retain in `revs` only its relative heads.
///
/// This is an in-place operation, so that control of the incoming
/// set is left to the caller.
/// - a direct Python binding would probably need to build its own `HashSet`
/// from an incoming iterable, even if its sole purpose is to extract the
/// heads.
/// - a Rust caller can decide whether cloning beforehand is appropriate
///
/// # Performance notes
/// Internally, this function will store a full copy of `revs` in a `Vec`.
pub fn retain_heads(
graph: &impl Graph,
revs: &mut HashSet<Revision>,
) -> Result<(), GraphError> {
revs.remove(&NULL_REVISION);
// we need to construct an iterable copy of revs to avoid itering while
// mutating
let as_vec: Vec<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
for rev in as_vec {
if rev != NULL_REVISION {
remove_parents(graph, rev, revs)?;
}
}
Ok(())
}
/// Roots of `revs`, passed as a `HashSet`
///
/// They are returned in arbitrary order
pub fn roots<G: Graph>(
graph: &G,
revs: &HashSet<Revision>,
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
let mut roots: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new();
for rev in revs {
if graph
.parents(*rev)?
.iter()
.filter(|p| **p != NULL_REVISION)
.all(|p| !revs.contains(p))
{
roots.push(*rev);
}
}
Ok(roots)
}
/// Compute the topological range between two collections of revisions
///
/// This is equivalent to the revset `<roots>::<heads>`.
///
/// Currently, the given `Graph` has to implement `Clone`, which means
/// actually cloning just a reference-counted Python pointer if
/// it's passed over through `rust-cpython`. This is due to the internal
/// use of `AncestorsIterator`
///
/// # Algorithmic details
///
/// This is a two-pass swipe inspired from what `reachableroots2` from
/// `mercurial.cext.parsers` does to obtain the same results.
///
/// - first, we climb up the DAG from `heads` in topological order, keeping
/// them in the vector `heads_ancestors` vector, and adding any element of
/// `roots` we find among them to the resulting range.
/// - Then, we iterate on that recorded vector so that a revision is always
/// emitted after its parents and add all revisions whose parents are already
/// in the range to the results.
///
/// # Performance notes
///
/// The main difference with the C implementation is that
/// the latter uses a flat array with bit flags, instead of complex structures
/// like `HashSet`, making it faster in most scenarios. In theory, it's
/// possible that the present implementation could be more memory efficient
/// for very large repositories with many branches.
pub fn range(
graph: &(impl Graph + Clone),
roots: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>,
heads: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>,
) -> Result<BTreeSet<Revision>, GraphError> {
let mut range = BTreeSet::new();
let roots: HashSet<Revision> = roots.into_iter().collect();
let min_root: Revision = match roots.iter().cloned().min() {
None => {
return Ok(range);
}
Some(r) => r,
};
// Internally, AncestorsIterator currently maintains a `HashSet`
// of all seen revision, which is also what we record, albeit in an ordered
// way. There's room for improvement on this duplication.
let ait = AncestorsIterator::new(graph.clone(), heads, min_root, true)?;
let mut heads_ancestors: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new();
for revres in ait {
let rev = revres?;
if roots.contains(&rev) {
range.insert(rev);
}
heads_ancestors.push(rev);
}
for rev in heads_ancestors.into_iter().rev() {
for parent in graph.parents(rev)?.iter() {
if *parent != NULL_REVISION && range.contains(parent) {
range.insert(rev);
}
}
}
Ok(range)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use crate::testing::SampleGraph;
/// Apply `retain_heads()` to the given slice and return as a sorted `Vec`
fn retain_heads_sorted(
graph: &impl Graph,
revs: &[Revision],
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
let mut revs: HashSet<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
retain_heads(graph, &mut revs)?;
let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
as_vec.sort();
Ok(as_vec)
}
#[test]
fn test_retain_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
assert_eq!(retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![5, 6]);
assert_eq!(
retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
vec![1, 6, 12]
);
assert_eq!(
retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
vec![3, 5, 8, 9]
);
Ok(())
}
/// Apply `heads()` to the given slice and return as a sorted `Vec`
fn heads_sorted(
graph: &impl Graph,
revs: &[Revision],
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
let heads = heads(graph, revs.iter())?;
let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = heads.iter().cloned().collect();
as_vec.sort();
Ok(as_vec)
}
#[test]
fn test_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
assert_eq!(heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![5, 6]);
assert_eq!(
heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
vec![1, 6, 12]
);
assert_eq!(
heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
vec![3, 5, 8, 9]
);
Ok(())
}
/// Apply `roots()` and sort the result for easier comparison
fn roots_sorted(
graph: &impl Graph,
revs: &[Revision],
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
let mut as_vec = roots(graph, &revs.iter().cloned().collect())?;
as_vec.sort();
Ok(as_vec)
}
#[test]
fn test_roots() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
assert_eq!(roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![4]);
assert_eq!(
roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
vec![0, 4, 12]
);
assert_eq!(
roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
vec![1, 8]
);
Ok(())
}
/// Apply `range()` and convert the result into a Vec for easier comparison
fn range_vec(
graph: impl Graph + Clone,
roots: &[Revision],
heads: &[Revision],
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
range(&graph, roots.iter().cloned(), heads.iter().cloned())
.map(|bs| bs.into_iter().collect())
}
#[test]
fn test_range() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
assert_eq!(range_vec(SampleGraph, &[0], &[4])?, vec![0, 1, 2, 4]);
assert_eq!(range_vec(SampleGraph, &[0], &[8])?, vec![]);
assert_eq!(
range_vec(SampleGraph, &[5, 6], &[10, 11, 13])?,
vec![5, 10]
);
assert_eq!(
range_vec(SampleGraph, &[5, 6], &[10, 12])?,
vec![5, 6, 9, 10, 12]
);
Ok(())
}
}