##// END OF EJS Templates
posix: always seek to EOF when opening a file in append mode...
posix: always seek to EOF when opening a file in append mode Python 3 already does this, so skip it there. Consider the program: #include <stdio.h> int main() { FILE *f = fopen("narf", "w"); fprintf(f, "narf\n"); fclose(f); f = fopen("narf", "a"); printf("%ld\n", ftell(f)); fprintf(f, "troz\n"); printf("%ld\n", ftell(f)); return 0; } on macOS, FreeBSD, and Linux with glibc, this program prints 5 10 but on musl libc (Alpine Linux and probably others) this prints 0 10 By my reading of https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/fopen.html this is technically correct, specifically: > Opening a file with append mode (a as the first character in the > mode argument) shall cause all subsequent writes to the file to be > forced to the then current end-of-file, regardless of intervening > calls to fseek(). in other words, the file position doesn't really matter in append-mode files, and we can't depend on it being at all meaningful unless we perform a seek() before tell() after open(..., 'a'). Experimentally after a .write() we can do a .tell() and it'll always be reasonable, but I'm unclear from reading the specification if that's a smart thing to rely on. This matches what we do on Windows and what Python 3 does for free, so let's just be consistent. Thanks to Yuya for the idea.

File last commit:

r34662:eb586ed5 default
r43163:97ada9b8 5.0.2 stable
Show More
test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t
143 lines | 2.4 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
changesets, so first we have to recreate it
o 8
|
| o 7
| |
| o 6
|/|
o | 5
| |
o | 4
| |
| o 3
| |
| o 2
|/
o 1
|
o 0
$ mkrev()
> {
> revno=$1
> echo "rev $revno"
> echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
> hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
> }
setup test repo1
$ hg init repo1
$ cd repo1
$ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
$ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
adding foo.txt
$ mkrev 1
rev 1
first branch
$ mkrev 2
rev 2
$ mkrev 3
rev 3
back to rev 1 to create second branch
$ hg up -r1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkrev 4
rev 4
$ mkrev 5
rev 5
merge first branch to second branch
$ hg up -C -r5
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
$ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"
one more commit following the merge
$ mkrev 7
rev 7
back to "second branch" to make another head
$ hg up -r5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkrev 8
rev 8
the story so far
$ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n"
@ 8
|
| o 7
| |
| o 6
|/|
o | 5
| |
o | 4
| |
| o 3
| |
| o 2
|/
o 1
|
o 0
check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing
sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8
$ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
new changesets 6ae4cca4e39a:478f191e53f8
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8
$ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
comparing with ../repo2
searching for changes
4
5
6
7
8
test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions
this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it
actually bundles 7
$ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
searching for changes
5 changesets found
test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions
this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle
with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too
$ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
5 changesets found
$ cd ..