##// END OF EJS Templates
posix: always seek to EOF when opening a file in append mode...
posix: always seek to EOF when opening a file in append mode Python 3 already does this, so skip it there. Consider the program: #include <stdio.h> int main() { FILE *f = fopen("narf", "w"); fprintf(f, "narf\n"); fclose(f); f = fopen("narf", "a"); printf("%ld\n", ftell(f)); fprintf(f, "troz\n"); printf("%ld\n", ftell(f)); return 0; } on macOS, FreeBSD, and Linux with glibc, this program prints 5 10 but on musl libc (Alpine Linux and probably others) this prints 0 10 By my reading of https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/fopen.html this is technically correct, specifically: > Opening a file with append mode (a as the first character in the > mode argument) shall cause all subsequent writes to the file to be > forced to the then current end-of-file, regardless of intervening > calls to fseek(). in other words, the file position doesn't really matter in append-mode files, and we can't depend on it being at all meaningful unless we perform a seek() before tell() after open(..., 'a'). Experimentally after a .write() we can do a .tell() and it'll always be reasonable, but I'm unclear from reading the specification if that's a smart thing to rely on. This matches what we do on Windows and what Python 3 does for free, so let's just be consistent. Thanks to Yuya for the idea.

File last commit:

r42765:4764e843 default
r43163:97ada9b8 5.0.2 stable
Show More
test-merge-remove.t
116 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo bar > bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'
$ echo foo2 >> foo
$ echo bleh > bar
$ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'
$ hg up -qC 0
$ hg mv foo foo1
$ echo foo1 > foo1
$ hg cat foo >> foo1
$ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
created new head
$ hg merge
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
m 0 -2 unset bar
m 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -q
M bar
M foo1
Removing foo1 and bar:
$ cp foo1 F
$ cp bar B
$ hg rm -f foo1 bar
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
r 0 -1 set bar
r 0 -1 set foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
R bar
R foo1
Re-adding foo1 and bar:
$ cp F foo1
$ cp B bar
$ hg add -v foo1 bar
adding bar
adding foo1
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
Reverting foo1 and bar:
$ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
saving current version of bar as bar.orig
saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
reverting bar
reverting foo1
$ hg debugstate --no-dates
n 0 -2 unset bar
n 0 -2 unset foo1
copy: foo -> foo1
$ hg st -qC
M bar
M foo1
foo
$ hg diff
Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove
$ rm *
$ hg up -qC
$ hg rm bar
$ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
$ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
$ hg merge
bar: untracked file differs
abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
[255]
$ cat bar
memories of buried pirate treasure
Those who use force will lose
$ hg merge -f
file 'bar' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
What do you want to do?
use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
merging foo1 and foo to foo1
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
[1]
$ cat bar
bleh
$ hg st
M bar
M foo1