##// END OF EJS Templates
mmap: populate the mapping by default...
mmap: populate the mapping by default Without pre-population, accessing all data through a mmap can result in many pagefault, reducing performance significantly. If the mmap is prepopulated, the performance can no longer get slower than a full read. (See benchmark number below) In some cases were very few data is read, prepopulating can be overkill and slower than populating on access (through page fault). So that behavior can be controlled when the caller can pre-determine the best behavior. (See benchmark number below) In addition, testing with populating in a secondary thread yield great result combining the best of each approach. This might be implemented in later changesets. In all cases, using mmap has a great effect on memory usage when many processes run in parallel on the same machine. ### Benchmarks # What did I run A couple of month back I ran a large benchmark campaign to assess the impact of various approach for using mmap with the revlog (and other files), it highlighted a few benchmarks that capture the impact of the changes well. So to validate this change I checked the following: - log command displaying various revisions (read the changelog index) - log command displaying the patch of listed revisions (read the changelog index, the manifest index and a few files indexes) - unbundling a few revisions (read and write changelog, manifest and few files indexes, and walk the graph to update some cache) - pushing a few revisions (read and write changelog, manifest and few files indexes, walk the graph to update some cache, performs various accesses locally and remotely during discovery) Benchmarks were run using the default module policy (c+py) and the rust one. No significant difference were found between the two implementation, so we will present result using the default policy (unless otherwise specified). I ran them on a few repositories : - mercurial: a "public changeset only" copy of mercurial from 2018-08-01 using zstd compression and sparse-revlog - pypy: a copy of pypy from 2018-08-01 using zstd compression and sparse-revlog - netbeans: a copy of netbeans from 2018-08-01 using zstd compression and sparse-revlog - mozilla-try: a copy of mozilla-try from 2019-02-18 using zstd compression and sparse-revlog - mozilla-try persistent-nodemap: Same as the above but with a persistent nodemap. Used for the log --patch benchmark only # Results For the smaller repositories (mercurial, pypy), the impact of mmap is almost imperceptible, other cost dominating the operation. The impact of prepopulating is undiscernible in the benchmark we ran. For larger repositories the benchmark support explanation given above: On netbeans, the log can be about 1% faster without repopulation (for a difference < 100ms) but unbundle becomes a bit slower, even when small. ### data-env-vars.name = netbeans-2018-08-01-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = hg.command.unbundle # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.reuse-external-delta-parent = yes # benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev # benchmark.variants.source = unbundle # benchmark.variants.verbosity = quiet with-populate: 0.240157 no-populate: 0.265087 (+10.38%, +0.02) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev with-populate: 1.459518 no-populate: 1.481290 (+1.49%, +0.02) ## benchmark.name = hg.command.push # benchmark.variants.explicit-rev = none # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.protocol = ssh # benchmark.variants.reuse-external-delta-parent = yes # benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev with-populate: 0.771919 no-populate: 0.792025 (+2.60%, +0.02) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev with-populate: 1.459518 no-populate: 1.481290 (+1.49%, +0.02) For mozilla-try, the "slow down" from pre-populate for small `hg log` is more visible, but still small in absolute time. (using rust value for the persistent nodemap value to be relevant). ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2019-02-18-ds2-pnm # benchmark.name = hg.command.log # bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = rust # benchmark.variants.patch = yes # benchmark.variants.limit-rev = 1 with-populate: 0.237813 no-populate: 0.229452 (-3.52%, -0.01) # benchmark.variants.limit-rev = 10 # benchmark.variants.patch = yes with-populate: 1.213578 no-populate: 1.205189 ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2019-02-18-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.variants.limit-rev = 1000 # benchmark.variants.patch = no # benchmark.variants.rev = tip with-populate: 0.198607 no-populate: 0.195038 (-1.80%, -0.00) However pre-populating provide a significant boost on more complex operations like unbundle or push: ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2019-02-18-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = hg.command.push # benchmark.variants.explicit-rev = none # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.protocol = ssh # benchmark.variants.reuse-external-delta-parent = yes # benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev with-populate: 4.798632 no-populate: 4.953295 (+3.22%, +0.15) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev with-populate: 4.903618 no-populate: 5.014963 (+2.27%, +0.11) ## benchmark.name = hg.command.unbundle # benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev with-populate: 1.423411 no-populate: 1.585365 (+11.38%, +0.16) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev with-populate: 1.537909 no-populate: 1.688489 (+9.79%, +0.15)

File last commit:

r44583:d56a2d6f default
r52574:522b4d72 default
Show More
scripting.txt
210 lines | 8.0 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
It is common for machines (as opposed to humans) to consume Mercurial.
This help topic describes some of the considerations for interfacing
machines with Mercurial.
Choosing an Interface
=====================
Machines have a choice of several methods to interface with Mercurial.
These include:
- Executing the ``hg`` process
- Querying a HTTP server
- Calling out to a command server
Executing ``hg`` processes is very similar to how humans interact with
Mercurial in the shell. It should already be familiar to you.
:hg:`serve` can be used to start a server. By default, this will start
a "hgweb" HTTP server. This HTTP server has support for machine-readable
output, such as JSON. For more, see :hg:`help hgweb`.
:hg:`serve` can also start a "command server." Clients can connect
to this server and issue Mercurial commands over a special protocol.
For more details on the command server, including links to client
libraries, see https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/CommandServer.
:hg:`serve` based interfaces (the hgweb and command servers) have the
advantage over simple ``hg`` process invocations in that they are
likely more efficient. This is because there is significant overhead
to spawn new Python processes.
.. tip::
If you need to invoke several ``hg`` processes in short order and/or
performance is important to you, use of a server-based interface
is highly recommended.
Environment Variables
=====================
As documented in :hg:`help environment`, various environment variables
influence the operation of Mercurial. The following are particularly
relevant for machines consuming Mercurial:
HGPLAIN
If not set, Mercurial's output could be influenced by configuration
settings that impact its encoding, verbose mode, localization, etc.
It is highly recommended for machines to set this variable when
invoking ``hg`` processes.
HGENCODING
If not set, the locale used by Mercurial will be detected from the
environment. If the determined locale does not support display of
certain characters, Mercurial may render these character sequences
incorrectly (often by using "?" as a placeholder for invalid
characters in the current locale).
Explicitly setting this environment variable is a good practice to
guarantee consistent results. "utf-8" is a good choice on UNIX-like
environments.
HGRCPATH
If not set, Mercurial will inherit config options from config files
using the process described in :hg:`help config`. This includes
inheriting user or system-wide config files.
When utmost control over the Mercurial configuration is desired, the
value of ``HGRCPATH`` can be set to an explicit file with known good
configs. In rare cases, the value can be set to an empty file or the
null device (often ``/dev/null``) to bypass loading of any user or
system config files. Note that these approaches can have unintended
consequences, as the user and system config files often define things
like the username and extensions that may be required to interface
with a repository.
HGRCSKIPREPO
When set, the .hg/hgrc from repositories are not read.
Note that not reading the repository's configuration can have
unintended consequences, as the repository config files can define
things like extensions that are required for access to the
repository.
Command-line Flags
==================
Mercurial's default command-line parser is designed for humans, and is not
robust against malicious input. For instance, you can start a debugger by
passing ``--debugger`` as an option value::
$ REV=--debugger sh -c 'hg log -r "$REV"'
This happens because several command-line flags need to be scanned without
using a concrete command table, which may be modified while loading repository
settings and extensions.
Since Mercurial 4.4.2, the parsing of such flags may be restricted by setting
``HGPLAIN=+strictflags``. When this feature is enabled, all early options
(e.g. ``-R/--repository``, ``--cwd``, ``--config``) must be specified first
amongst the other global options, and cannot be injected to an arbitrary
location::
$ HGPLAIN=+strictflags hg -R "$REPO" log -r "$REV"
In earlier Mercurial versions where ``+strictflags`` isn't available, you
can mitigate the issue by concatenating an option value with its flag::
$ hg log -r"$REV" --keyword="$KEYWORD"
Consuming Command Output
========================
It is common for machines to need to parse the output of Mercurial
commands for relevant data. This section describes the various
techniques for doing so.
Parsing Raw Command Output
--------------------------
Likely the simplest and most effective solution for consuming command
output is to simply invoke ``hg`` commands as you would as a user and
parse their output.
The output of many commands can easily be parsed with tools like
``grep``, ``sed``, and ``awk``.
A potential downside with parsing command output is that the output
of commands can change when Mercurial is upgraded. While Mercurial
does generally strive for strong backwards compatibility, command
output does occasionally change. Having tests for your automated
interactions with ``hg`` commands is generally recommended, but is
even more important when raw command output parsing is involved.
Using Templates to Control Output
---------------------------------
Many ``hg`` commands support templatized output via the
``-T/--template`` argument. For more, see :hg:`help templates`.
Templates are useful for explicitly controlling output so that
you get exactly the data you want formatted how you want it. For
example, ``log -T {node}\n`` can be used to print a newline
delimited list of changeset nodes instead of a human-tailored
output containing authors, dates, descriptions, etc.
.. tip::
If parsing raw command output is too complicated, consider
using templates to make your life easier.
The ``-T/--template`` argument allows specifying pre-defined styles.
Mercurial ships with the machine-readable styles ``cbor``, ``json``,
and ``xml``, which provide CBOR, JSON, and XML output, respectively.
These are useful for producing output that is machine readable as-is.
(Mercurial 5.0 is required for CBOR style.)
.. important::
The ``json`` and ``xml`` styles are considered experimental. While
they may be attractive to use for easily obtaining machine-readable
output, their behavior may change in subsequent versions.
These styles may also exhibit unexpected results when dealing with
certain encodings. Mercurial treats things like filenames as a
series of bytes and normalizing certain byte sequences to JSON
or XML with certain encoding settings can lead to surprises.
Command Server Output
---------------------
If using the command server to interact with Mercurial, you are likely
using an existing library/API that abstracts implementation details of
the command server. If so, this interface layer may perform parsing for
you, saving you the work of implementing it yourself.
Output Verbosity
----------------
Commands often have varying output verbosity, even when machine
readable styles are being used (e.g. ``-T json``). Adding
``-v/--verbose`` and ``--debug`` to the command's arguments can
increase the amount of data exposed by Mercurial.
An alternate way to get the data you need is by explicitly specifying
a template.
Other Topics
============
revsets
Revisions sets is a functional query language for selecting a set
of revisions. Think of it as SQL for Mercurial repositories. Revsets
are useful for querying repositories for specific data.
See :hg:`help revsets` for more.
share extension
The ``share`` extension provides functionality for sharing
repository data across several working copies. It can even
automatically "pool" storage for logically related repositories when
cloning.
Configuring the ``share`` extension can lead to significant resource
utilization reduction, particularly around disk space and the
network. This is especially true for continuous integration (CI)
environments.
See :hg:`help -e share` for more.