##// END OF EJS Templates
narrow: fix commits of empty files...
narrow: fix commits of empty files The problem is that when committing a new file with empty contents (or in general empty file with filelog p1 = -1), hg commit with narrow doesn't create a filelog revision at all, which causes failures in further commands. The problem seems to be that: - hg thinks that instead of creating a new filelog revision, it can use the filelog's p1 (the nullrev) - because it thinks the file contents is the same in that revision and in p1 - because `narrowfilelog.cmp(nullrev, b'')` is True (unlike with `filelog.cmp`) It's not clear to me which `cmp` behaves better. But I think it makes sense to change the commit code to not to "reuse" the null rev when adding an empty file with filelog p1 == filelog p2 == -1. This is consistent with never writing the null rev in the manifest, which `hg verify` claims is an invariant: ``` inside/c@4: manifest refers to unknown revision 000000000000 ``` Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D11400

File last commit:

r45240:27fe8cc1 default
r48770:5b9de38a stable
Show More
attachio.rs
68 lines | 2.4 KiB | application/rls-services+xml | RustLexer
// Copyright 2018 Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org>
//
// This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
// GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
//! Functions to send client-side fds over the command server channel.
use std::io;
use std::os::unix::io::AsRawFd;
use tokio_hglib::codec::ChannelMessage;
use tokio_hglib::{Connection, Protocol};
use crate::message;
use crate::procutil;
/// Sends client-side fds over the command server channel.
///
/// This works as follows:
/// 1. Client sends "attachio" request.
/// 2. Server sends back 1-byte input request.
/// 3. Client sends fds with 1-byte dummy payload in response.
/// 4. Server returns the number of the fds received.
///
/// The client-side fds may be dropped once duplicated to the server.
pub async fn attach_io(
proto: &mut Protocol<impl Connection + AsRawFd>,
stdin: &impl AsRawFd,
stdout: &impl AsRawFd,
stderr: &impl AsRawFd,
) -> io::Result<()> {
proto.send_command("attachio").await?;
loop {
match proto.fetch_response().await? {
ChannelMessage::Data(b'r', data) => {
let fd_cnt = message::parse_result_code(data)?;
if fd_cnt == 3 {
return Ok(());
} else {
return Err(io::Error::new(
io::ErrorKind::InvalidData,
"unexpected attachio result",
));
}
}
ChannelMessage::Data(..) => {
// just ignore data sent to uninteresting (optional) channel
}
ChannelMessage::InputRequest(1) => {
// this may fail with EWOULDBLOCK in theory, but the
// payload is quite small, and the send buffer should
// be empty so the operation will complete immediately
let sock_fd = proto.as_raw_fd();
let ifd = stdin.as_raw_fd();
let ofd = stdout.as_raw_fd();
let efd = stderr.as_raw_fd();
procutil::send_raw_fds(sock_fd, &[ifd, ofd, efd])?;
}
ChannelMessage::InputRequest(..)
| ChannelMessage::LineRequest(..)
| ChannelMessage::SystemRequest(..) => {
return Err(io::Error::new(
io::ErrorKind::InvalidData,
"unsupported request while attaching io",
));
}
}
}
}