##// END OF EJS Templates
changegroup: don't fail on empty changegroup (API)...
changegroup: don't fail on empty changegroup (API) I don't know why applying an empty changegroup should be an error. It seems harmless. I suspect the check was there to find code that creates empty changegroups just because that would be wasteful. Let's use develwarn() for that instead, so we catch any such cases that run with our test runner, but we still allow others to generate empty changegroups if they want to. We have run into this check at Google once or twice and had to work around it, but I'm changing this not so much because of that, but because it seems like it shouldn't be an error. I also changed the message slightly to be more modern ("changelog group" -> "changegroup") and more generic ("received" -> "applied").

File last commit:

r32646:b4356d1c default
r33309:69c4493a default
Show More
bitmanipulation.h
55 lines | 954 B | text/x-c | CLexer
#ifndef _HG_BITMANIPULATION_H_
#define _HG_BITMANIPULATION_H_
#include <string.h>
#include "compat.h"
static inline uint32_t getbe32(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((d[0] << 24) |
(d[1] << 16) |
(d[2] << 8) |
(d[3]));
}
static inline int16_t getbeint16(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((d[0] << 8) |
(d[1]));
}
static inline uint16_t getbeuint16(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((d[0] << 8) |
(d[1]));
}
static inline void putbe32(uint32_t x, char *c)
{
c[0] = (x >> 24) & 0xff;
c[1] = (x >> 16) & 0xff;
c[2] = (x >> 8) & 0xff;
c[3] = (x) & 0xff;
}
static inline double getbefloat64(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
double ret;
int i;
uint64_t t = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
t = (t<<8) + d[i];
}
memcpy(&ret, &t, sizeof(t));
return ret;
}
#endif