##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: use command executor for batch operation...
largefiles: use command executor for batch operation This is the only other user of iterbatch() in core. Tests changed because the new command executor is smart enough to not send a "batch" command over the wire if only 1 command was requested. There is still coverage for the "batch" command in this test though. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3270

File last commit:

r33761:4c706037 default
r37650:6c55ce51 default
Show More
test-batching.py.out
26 lines | 526 B | text/plain | TextLexer
/ tests / test-batching.py.out
== Local
Ready.
Un and Deux
Eins und Zwei
One and Two
Eins und Zwei
Uno und Due
proper end of results generator
== Remote
Ready.
REQ: foo?one=Vo&two=Efvy
-> Vo!boe!Efvy
Un and Deux
REQ: bar?b=Fjot&a=[xfj
-> Fjot!voe![xfj
Eins und Zwei
REQ: batch?cmds=foo:one=Pof,two=Uxp;bar:b=Fjot,a=[xfj;bar:b=Vop,a=Evf
-> Pof!boe!Uxp;Fjot!voe![xfj;Vop!voe!Evf
One and Two
Eins und Zwei
Uno und Due
proper end of results generator
Attempted to batch a non-batchable call to 'greet'
Attempted to batch a non-batchable call to 'hello'