##// END OF EJS Templates
copies: make mergecopies() distinguish between copies on each side...
copies: make mergecopies() distinguish between copies on each side I find it confusing that most of the dicts returned from `mergecopies()` have entries specific to one branch of the merge, but they're still combined into dict. For example, you can't tell if `copy = {"bar": "foo"}` means that "foo" was copied to "bar" on the first branch or the second. It also feels like there are bugs lurking here because we may mistake which side the copy happened on. However, for most of the dicts, it's not possible that there is disagreement. For example, `renamedelete` keeps track of renames that happened on one side of the merge where the other side deleted the file. There can't be a disagreement there (because we record that in the `diverge` dict instead). For regular copies/renames, there can be a disagreement. Let's say file "foo" was copied to "bar" on one branch and file "baz" was copied to "bar" on the other. Beacause we only return one `copy` dict, we end up replacing the `{"bar": "foo"}` entry by `{"bar": "baz"}`. The merge code (`manifestmerge()`) will then decide that that means "both renamed from 'baz'". We should probably treat it as a conflict instead. The next few patches will make `mergecopies()` return two instances of most of the returned copies. That will lead to a bit more code (~40 lines), but I think it makes both `copies.mergecopies()` and `merge.manifestmerge()` clearer. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7986

File last commit:

r44651:5de70f79 default
r44657:6ca9f45b default
Show More
test-rename-merge1.t
256 lines | 6.7 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-rename-merge1.t
$ hg init
$ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo foo > a
$ echo foo > a2
$ hg add a a2
$ hg ci -m "start"
$ hg mv a b
$ hg mv a2 b2
$ hg ci -m "rename"
$ hg co 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo blahblah > a
$ echo blahblah > a2
$ hg mv a2 c2
$ hg ci -m "modify"
created new head
$ hg merge -y --debug
unmatched files in local:
c2
unmatched files in other:
b
b2
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
b2
c2
preserving a for resolve of b
removing a
b2: remote created -> g
getting b2
b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
merging a and b to b
my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
premerge successful
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -AC
M b
a
M b2
R a
C c2
$ cat b
blahblah
$ hg ci -m "merge"
$ hg debugindex b
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000
1 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f
$ hg debugrename b
b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66
This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg cp b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
$ hg up '.^'
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm b3 b4
$ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'
We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg mv b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
$ hg up '.^'
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Check for issue2642
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1 # backport
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ hg ci -qm3
$ hg merge 2
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c0
$ cd ..
Check for issue2089
$ hg init repo2089
$ cd repo2089
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ echo c2 > f1
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 1 -q
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -Aqm3
$ hg up 2 -q
$ hg merge 3
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c2
$ cd ..
Check for issue3074
$ hg init repo3074
$ cd repo3074
$ echo foo > file
$ hg add file
$ hg commit -m "added file"
$ hg mv file newfile
$ hg commit -m "renamed file"
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm file
$ hg commit -m "deleted file"
created new head
$ hg merge --debug
unmatched files in other:
newfile
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
newfile
newfile: remote created -> g
getting newfile
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status
M newfile
$ cd ..
Create x and y, then modify y and rename x to z on one side of merge, and
modify x and rename y to z on the other side.
$ hg init conflicting-target
$ cd conflicting-target
$ echo x > x
$ echo y > y
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y'
$ hg mv x z
$ echo foo >> y
$ hg ci -qm 'modify y, rename x to z'
$ hg co -q 0
$ hg mv y z
$ echo foo >> x
$ hg ci -qm 'modify x, rename y to z'
# We should probably tell the user about the conflicting rename sources.
# Depending on which side they pick, we should take that rename and get
# the changes to the source from the other side. The unchanged file should
# remain.
# we should not get the prompts about modify/delete conflicts
$ hg merge --debug 1 -t :merge3
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'x' -> dst: 'z'
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 5151c134577e, local: 07fcbc9a74ed+, remote: f21419739508
preserving x for resolve of x
preserving z for resolve of z
starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
x: prompt changed/deleted -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':prompt' for x (binary False symlink False changedelete True)
file 'x' was deleted in other [merge rev] but was modified in local [working copy].
You can use (c)hanged version, (d)elete, or leave (u)nresolved.
What do you want to do? u
y: prompt deleted/changed -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':prompt' for y (binary False symlink False changedelete True)
file 'y' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
You can use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved.
What do you want to do? u
z: both created -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':merge3' for z (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
merging z
my z@07fcbc9a74ed+ other z@f21419739508 ancestor z@000000000000
z: both created -> m (merge)
picked tool ':merge3' for z (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
my z@07fcbc9a74ed+ other z@f21419739508 ancestor z@000000000000
warning: conflicts while merging z! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 3 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
[1]
$ ls
x
y
z
z.orig
$ cat x
x
foo
$ cat y
y
foo
# 'z' should have had the added 'foo' line
$ cat z
<<<<<<< working copy: 07fcbc9a74ed - test: modify x, rename y to z
y
||||||| base
=======
x
>>>>>>> merge rev: f21419739508 - test: modify y, rename x to z