##// END OF EJS Templates
merge: refuse update/merge if there are unresolved conflicts (BC)...
merge: refuse update/merge if there are unresolved conflicts (BC) We currently allow updating and merging (with --force) when there are unresolved merge conflicts, as long as there is only one parent of the working copy. Even worse, when updating to another revision (linearly), if one of the unresolved files (including any conflict markers in the working copy) can now be merged cleanly with the target revision, the file becomes marked as resolved. While we could potentially allow updates that affect only files that are not in the set of unresolved files, that's considerably more work, and we don't have a use case for it anyway. Instead, let's keep it simple and refuse any merge or update (without -C) when there are unresolved conflicts. Note that test-merge-local.t explicitly checks for conflict markers that get carried over on update. It's unclear if that was intentional or not, but it seems bad enough that we should forbid it. The simplest way of fixing the test case is to leave the conflict markers in place and just mark the files resolved, so let's just do that for now.

File last commit:

r26587:56b2bcea default
r27316:777f668e default
Show More
treediscovery.py
159 lines | 5.2 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# discovery.py - protocol changeset discovery functions
#
# Copyright 2010 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
import collections
from .i18n import _
from .node import (
nullid,
short,
)
from . import (
error,
)
def findcommonincoming(repo, remote, heads=None, force=False):
"""Return a tuple (common, fetch, heads) used to identify the common
subset of nodes between repo and remote.
"common" is a list of (at least) the heads of the common subset.
"fetch" is a list of roots of the nodes that would be incoming, to be
supplied to changegroupsubset.
"heads" is either the supplied heads, or else the remote's heads.
"""
knownnode = repo.changelog.hasnode
search = []
fetch = set()
seen = set()
seenbranch = set()
base = set()
if not heads:
heads = remote.heads()
if repo.changelog.tip() == nullid:
base.add(nullid)
if heads != [nullid]:
return [nullid], [nullid], list(heads)
return [nullid], [], heads
# assume we're closer to the tip than the root
# and start by examining the heads
repo.ui.status(_("searching for changes\n"))
unknown = []
for h in heads:
if not knownnode(h):
unknown.append(h)
else:
base.add(h)
if not unknown:
return list(base), [], list(heads)
req = set(unknown)
reqcnt = 0
# search through remote branches
# a 'branch' here is a linear segment of history, with four parts:
# head, root, first parent, second parent
# (a branch always has two parents (or none) by definition)
unknown = collections.deque(remote.branches(unknown))
while unknown:
r = []
while unknown:
n = unknown.popleft()
if n[0] in seen:
continue
repo.ui.debug("examining %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
if n[0] == nullid: # found the end of the branch
pass
elif n in seenbranch:
repo.ui.debug("branch already found\n")
continue
elif n[1] and knownnode(n[1]): # do we know the base?
repo.ui.debug("found incomplete branch %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
search.append(n[0:2]) # schedule branch range for scanning
seenbranch.add(n)
else:
if n[1] not in seen and n[1] not in fetch:
if knownnode(n[2]) and knownnode(n[3]):
repo.ui.debug("found new changeset %s\n" %
short(n[1]))
fetch.add(n[1]) # earliest unknown
for p in n[2:4]:
if knownnode(p):
base.add(p) # latest known
for p in n[2:4]:
if p not in req and not knownnode(p):
r.append(p)
req.add(p)
seen.add(n[0])
if r:
reqcnt += 1
repo.ui.progress(_('searching'), reqcnt, unit=_('queries'))
repo.ui.debug("request %d: %s\n" %
(reqcnt, " ".join(map(short, r))))
for p in xrange(0, len(r), 10):
for b in remote.branches(r[p:p + 10]):
repo.ui.debug("received %s:%s\n" %
(short(b[0]), short(b[1])))
unknown.append(b)
# do binary search on the branches we found
while search:
newsearch = []
reqcnt += 1
repo.ui.progress(_('searching'), reqcnt, unit=_('queries'))
for n, l in zip(search, remote.between(search)):
l.append(n[1])
p = n[0]
f = 1
for i in l:
repo.ui.debug("narrowing %d:%d %s\n" % (f, len(l), short(i)))
if knownnode(i):
if f <= 2:
repo.ui.debug("found new branch changeset %s\n" %
short(p))
fetch.add(p)
base.add(i)
else:
repo.ui.debug("narrowed branch search to %s:%s\n"
% (short(p), short(i)))
newsearch.append((p, i))
break
p, f = i, f * 2
search = newsearch
# sanity check our fetch list
for f in fetch:
if knownnode(f):
raise error.RepoError(_("already have changeset ")
+ short(f[:4]))
base = list(base)
if base == [nullid]:
if force:
repo.ui.warn(_("warning: repository is unrelated\n"))
else:
raise error.Abort(_("repository is unrelated"))
repo.ui.debug("found new changesets starting at " +
" ".join([short(f) for f in fetch]) + "\n")
repo.ui.progress(_('searching'), None)
repo.ui.debug("%d total queries\n" % reqcnt)
return base, list(fetch), heads