##// END OF EJS Templates
# User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <danchr@gmail.com>...
# User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <danchr@gmail.com> # Date 1289564504 -3600 # Node ID b75264c15cc888cf38c3c7b8f619801e3c2589c7 # Parent 89b2e5d940f669e590096c6be70eee61c9172fff revsets: overload the branch() revset to also take a branch name. This should only change semantics in the specific case of a tag/branch conflict where the tag wasn't done on the branch with the same name. Previously, branch(whatever) would resolve to the branch of the tag in that case, whereas now it will resolve to the branch of the name. The previous behaviour, while documented, seemed very counter-intuitive to me. An alternate approach would be to introduce a new revset such as branchname() or namedbranch(). While this would retain backwards compatibility, the distinction between it and branch() would not be readily apparent to users. The most intuitive behaviour would be to have branch(x) require 'x' to be a branch name, and something like branchof(x) or samebranch(x) do what branch(x) currently does. Unfortunately, our backwards compatibility guarantees prevent us from doing that. Please note that while 'hg tag' guards against shadowing a branch, 'hg branch' does not. Besides, even if it did, that wouldn't solve the issue of conversions with such tags and branches...

File last commit:

r12067:a4fbbe0f stable
r13750:7eb82f88 default
Show More
hbisect.py
155 lines | 5.0 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# changelog bisection for mercurial
#
# Copyright 2007 Matt Mackall
# Copyright 2005, 2006 Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
#
# Inspired by git bisect, extension skeleton taken from mq.py.
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
import os
from i18n import _
from node import short, hex
import util
def bisect(changelog, state):
"""find the next node (if any) for testing during a bisect search.
returns a (nodes, number, good) tuple.
'nodes' is the final result of the bisect if 'number' is 0.
Otherwise 'number' indicates the remaining possible candidates for
the search and 'nodes' contains the next bisect target.
'good' is True if bisect is searching for a first good changeset, False
if searching for a first bad one.
"""
clparents = changelog.parentrevs
skip = set([changelog.rev(n) for n in state['skip']])
def buildancestors(bad, good):
# only the earliest bad revision matters
badrev = min([changelog.rev(n) for n in bad])
goodrevs = [changelog.rev(n) for n in good]
goodrev = min(goodrevs)
# build visit array
ancestors = [None] * (len(changelog) + 1) # an extra for [-1]
# set nodes descended from goodrev
ancestors[goodrev] = []
for rev in xrange(goodrev + 1, len(changelog)):
for prev in clparents(rev):
if ancestors[prev] == []:
ancestors[rev] = []
# clear good revs from array
for node in goodrevs:
ancestors[node] = None
for rev in xrange(len(changelog), -1, -1):
if ancestors[rev] is None:
for prev in clparents(rev):
ancestors[prev] = None
if ancestors[badrev] is None:
return badrev, None
return badrev, ancestors
good = 0
badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['bad'], state['good'])
if not ancestors: # looking for bad to good transition?
good = 1
badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['good'], state['bad'])
bad = changelog.node(badrev)
if not ancestors: # now we're confused
if len(state['bad']) == 1 and len(state['good']) == 1:
raise util.Abort(_("starting revisions are not directly related"))
raise util.Abort(_("inconsistent state, %s:%s is good and bad")
% (badrev, short(bad)))
# build children dict
children = {}
visit = [badrev]
candidates = []
while visit:
rev = visit.pop(0)
if ancestors[rev] == []:
candidates.append(rev)
for prev in clparents(rev):
if prev != -1:
if prev in children:
children[prev].append(rev)
else:
children[prev] = [rev]
visit.append(prev)
candidates.sort()
# have we narrowed it down to one entry?
# or have all other possible candidates besides 'bad' have been skipped?
tot = len(candidates)
unskipped = [c for c in candidates if (c not in skip) and (c != badrev)]
if tot == 1 or not unskipped:
return ([changelog.node(rev) for rev in candidates], 0, good)
perfect = tot // 2
# find the best node to test
best_rev = None
best_len = -1
poison = set()
for rev in candidates:
if rev in poison:
# poison children
poison.update(children.get(rev, []))
continue
a = ancestors[rev] or [rev]
ancestors[rev] = None
x = len(a) # number of ancestors
y = tot - x # number of non-ancestors
value = min(x, y) # how good is this test?
if value > best_len and rev not in skip:
best_len = value
best_rev = rev
if value == perfect: # found a perfect candidate? quit early
break
if y < perfect and rev not in skip: # all downhill from here?
# poison children
poison.update(children.get(rev, []))
continue
for c in children.get(rev, []):
if ancestors[c]:
ancestors[c] = list(set(ancestors[c] + a))
else:
ancestors[c] = a + [c]
assert best_rev is not None
best_node = changelog.node(best_rev)
return ([best_node], tot, good)
def load_state(repo):
state = {'good': [], 'bad': [], 'skip': []}
if os.path.exists(repo.join("bisect.state")):
for l in repo.opener("bisect.state"):
kind, node = l[:-1].split()
node = repo.lookup(node)
if kind not in state:
raise util.Abort(_("unknown bisect kind %s") % kind)
state[kind].append(node)
return state
def save_state(repo, state):
f = repo.opener("bisect.state", "w", atomictemp=True)
wlock = repo.wlock()
try:
for kind in state:
for node in state[kind]:
f.write("%s %s\n" % (kind, hex(node)))
f.rename()
finally:
wlock.release()