##// END OF EJS Templates
rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing...
rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing The DAG range computation often needs to get back to very old revisions, and turns out to be disproportionately long, given that the end goal is to remove the descendents of the given missing revisons from the undecided set. The fast iteration capabilities available in the Rust case make it possible to avoid the DAG range entirely, at the cost of precomputing the children cache, and to simply iterate on children of the given missing revisions. This is a case where staying on the same side of the interface between the two languages has clear benefits. On discoveries with initial undecided sets small enough to bypass sampling entirely, the total cost of computing the children cache and the subsequent iteration becomes better than the Python + C counterpart, which relies on reachableroots2. For example, on a repo with more than one million revisions with an initial undecided set of 11 elements, we get these figures: Rust version with simple iteration addcommons: 57.287us first undecided computation: 184.278334ms first children cache computation: 131.056us addmissings iteration: 42.766us first addinfo total: 185.24 ms Python + C version first addcommons: 0.29 ms addcommons 0.21 ms first undecided computation 191.35 ms addmissings 45.75 ms first addinfo total: 237.77 ms On discoveries with large undecided sets, the initial price paid makes the first addinfo slower than the Python + C version, but that's more than compensated by the gain in sampling and subsequent iterations. Here's an extreme example with an undecided set of a million revisions: Rust version: first undecided computation: 293.842629ms first children cache computation: 407.911297ms addmissings iteration: 34.312869ms first addinfo total: 776.02 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 1318.38 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings: 143.062us Python + C version: first undecided computation 298.13 ms addmissings 80.13 ms first addinfo total: 399.62 ms taking initial sample query 2: sampling time: 3957.23 ms query 2; still undecided: 1005013, sample size is: 200 addmissings 52.88 ms Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

File last commit:

r41277:168041fa default
r42970:8c9a6ade default
Show More
testing.rs
72 lines | 1.7 KiB | application/rls-services+xml | RustLexer
// testing.rs
//
// Copyright 2018 Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net>
//
// This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
// GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
use crate::{Graph, GraphError, Revision, NULL_REVISION};
/// A stub `Graph`, same as the one from `test-ancestor.py`
///
/// o 13
/// |
/// | o 12
/// | |
/// | | o 11
/// | | |\
/// | | | | o 10
/// | | | | |
/// | o---+ | 9
/// | | | | |
/// o | | | | 8
/// / / / /
/// | | o | 7
/// | | | |
/// o---+ | 6
/// / / /
/// | | o 5
/// | |/
/// | o 4
/// | |
/// o | 3
/// | |
/// | o 2
/// |/
/// o 1
/// |
/// o 0
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct SampleGraph;
impl Graph for SampleGraph {
fn parents(&self, rev: Revision) -> Result<[Revision; 2], GraphError> {
match rev {
0 => Ok([NULL_REVISION, NULL_REVISION]),
1 => Ok([0, NULL_REVISION]),
2 => Ok([1, NULL_REVISION]),
3 => Ok([1, NULL_REVISION]),
4 => Ok([2, NULL_REVISION]),
5 => Ok([4, NULL_REVISION]),
6 => Ok([4, NULL_REVISION]),
7 => Ok([4, NULL_REVISION]),
8 => Ok([NULL_REVISION, NULL_REVISION]),
9 => Ok([6, 7]),
10 => Ok([5, NULL_REVISION]),
11 => Ok([3, 7]),
12 => Ok([9, NULL_REVISION]),
13 => Ok([8, NULL_REVISION]),
r => Err(GraphError::ParentOutOfRange(r)),
}
}
}
// A Graph represented by a vector whose indices are revisions
// and values are parents of the revisions
pub type VecGraph = Vec<[Revision; 2]>;
impl Graph for VecGraph {
fn parents(&self, rev: Revision) -> Result<[Revision; 2], GraphError> {
Ok(self[rev as usize])
}
}