##// END OF EJS Templates
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress()...
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress() I think ui.makeprogress() should be the preferred interface and we should deprecate ui.progress(). All in-core callers already use ui.makeprogress(). Moving the logic to the scmutil.progress() will let us make further improvements. This seems to have sped up `hg perfprogress` from 1.92 s to 1.85 s, perhaps because we now skip the indirection of updating the progress bar via ui.progress(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5527

File last commit:

r30406:cff0f592 default
r41178:8cf92ca9 default
Show More
perf.py
26 lines | 649 B | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# perf.py - asv benchmarks using contrib/perf.py extension
#
# Copyright 2016 Logilab SA <contact@logilab.fr>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
from . import perfbench
@perfbench()
def track_tags(perf):
return perf("perftags")
@perfbench()
def track_status(perf):
return perf("perfstatus", unknown=False)
@perfbench(params=[('rev', ['1000', '10000', 'tip'])])
def track_manifest(perf, rev):
return perf("perfmanifest", rev)
@perfbench()
def track_heads(perf):
return perf("perfheads")