##// END OF EJS Templates
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress()...
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress() I think ui.makeprogress() should be the preferred interface and we should deprecate ui.progress(). All in-core callers already use ui.makeprogress(). Moving the logic to the scmutil.progress() will let us make further improvements. This seems to have sped up `hg perfprogress` from 1.92 s to 1.85 s, perhaps because we now skip the indirection of updating the progress bar via ui.progress(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5527

File last commit:

r40157:73fef626 default
r41178:8cf92ca9 default
Show More
MANIFEST.in
10 lines | 160 B | text/plain | TextLexer
graft c-ext
graft debian
graft zstd
graft tests
include make_cffi.py
include setup_zstd.py
include zstd.c
include zstd_cffi.py
include LICENSE
include NEWS.rst